Sex differences in visual spatial ability in 9-year-old children

Intelligence ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Vederhus ◽  
Sturla Krekling
1990 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 546-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Goldstein ◽  
Diane Haldane ◽  
Carolyn Mitchell

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1051
Author(s):  
Valentina Bessi ◽  
Salvatore Mazzeo ◽  
Silvia Bagnoli ◽  
Giulia Giacomucci ◽  
Assunta Ingannato ◽  
...  

The Huntingtin gene (HTT) is within a class of genes containing a key region of CAG repeats. When expanded beyond 39 repeats, Huntington disease (HD) develops. Individuals with less than 35 repeats are not associated with HD. Increasing evidence has suggested that CAG repeats play a role in modulating brain development and brain function. However, very few studies have investigated the effect of CAG repeats in the non-pathological range on cognitive performances in non-demented individuals. In this study, we aimed to test how CAG repeats’ length influences neuropsychological scores in patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We included 75 patients (46 SCD and 29 MCI). All patients underwent an extensive neuropsychological battery and analysis of HTT alleles to quantify the number of CAG repeats. Results: CAG repeat number was positively correlated with scores of tests assessing for executive function, visual–spatial ability, and memory in SCD patients, while in MCI patients, it was inversely correlated with scores of visual–spatial ability and premorbid intelligence. When we performed a multiple regression analysis, we found that these relationships still remained, also when adjusting for possible confounding factors. Interestingly, logarithmic models better described the associations between CAG repeats and neuropsychological scores. CAG repeats in the HTT gene within the non-pathological range influenced neuropsychological performances depending on global cognitive status. The logarithmic model suggested that the positive effect of CAG repeats in SCD patients decreases as the number of repeats grows.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinchen Jardine ◽  
Benjamin Hoagland ◽  
Angel Perez ◽  
Eric Gessler

Abstract Background Manual dexterity and visual spatial ability are not routinely used to evaluate candidates for surgical residency training as part of the application interview. Objective This study assessed the acceptability and feasibility of evaluating the manual dexterity and visual spatial ability of applicants for general surgery and otolaryngology residency, and evaluated the relationship between this information and routinely considered application factors. Methods During the 2012 interview season, medical students applying to our institution's general surgery and otolaryngology residency programs underwent a battery of tests relevant to surgical dexterity. Five tests shown to be related to the surgeons' dexterity or visual spatial skills were administered during the course of their in-person interview day. The results from these tests were compared with data collected as part of the current application process. Results A total of 64 students were enrolled, and 58 had data that could be analyzed. Regression analysis using the enter method was performed for each of the tests, and for the composite scores. None of the values were significant as defined by P ≤ .05. Neither the scatterplots of the data nor Pearson r showed a correlation between the highest performers on the surgical dexterity composite score and individuals' highest scores on the dimensions used in the current process to assess applicants. Conclusions The addition of 1 or more evaluations of visual spatial skills and psychomotor aptitude can be done during a standard interview day, is acceptable to applicants, and may provide information that is different from the usual components of the application.


2004 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 332-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy L. Rilea ◽  
Beverly Roskos-Ewoldsen ◽  
David Boles

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. 1380-1387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Kurth ◽  
Debra Spencer ◽  
Melissa Hines ◽  
Eileen Luders

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document