The effect of training procedures on fixed-interval responding following septal lesions in rats

1985 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Poplawsky
1965 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Thomas Elder ◽  
James G. May ◽  
Merrill M. Rye

13 rats were prepared with chronically indwelling electrodes, the exposed tips of which were in the vicinity of median forebrain bundle. In addition, 7 of these received septal lesions, 2 were inflicted with unilateral hippocampal lesions, and 2 sustained unilateral lesions of the anterior neocortex. The remaining two Ss received no further surgery beyond the electrode implant. All were trained to bar press for brain stimulation at crf, FI 10-sec., FI 20-sec., FI 40-sec., FI 60-sec., FI 90-sec., and FI 120-sec. reinforcement contingencies, respectively. Although the major outcome of the study was that bar pressing could be developed and maintained by FI ICSS in a manner similar to FI food reinforcement, there were several characteristics of the FI ICSS-controlled behavior which distinguished it from bar pressing controlled by FI food reward. (1) Even when an S had been exposed to FI ICSS for as many as 28 hr., it was necessary at the beginning of each daily session to “prime” and “retrain” S. (2) For FI 60 sec. to FI 120 sec. the over-all rate and coarse grain of the cumulative record of the ICSS sustained behavior was less pronounced than that characteristic of food-controlled fixed-interval. (3) The lesions situated in the septum, hippocampus, and cortex did not alter the FI performance to a noticeable extent.


1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Nelson ◽  
Frank M. Lassman ◽  
Richard L. Hoel

Averaged auditory evoked responses to 1000-Hz 20-msec tone bursts were obtained from normal-hearing adults under two different intersignal interval schedules: (1) a fixed-interval schedule with 2-sec intersignal intervals, and (2) a variable-interval schedule of intersignal intervals ranging randomly from 1.0 sec to 4.5 sec with a mean of 2 sec. Peak-to-peak amplitudes (N 1 — P 2 ) as well as latencies of components P 1 , N 1 , P 2 , and N 2 were compared under the two different conditions of intersignal interval. No consistent or significant differences between variable- and fixed-interval schedules were found in the averaged responses to signals of either 20 dB SL or 50 dB SL. Neither were there significant schedule differences when 35 or 70 epochs were averaged per response. There were, however, significant effects due to signal amplitude and to the number of epochs averaged per response. Response amplitude increased and response latency decreased with sensation level of the tone burst.


1970 ◽  
Vol 71 (2, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 340-340
Author(s):  
Leonard W Hamilton ◽  
John E Kelsey ◽  
Sebastian P Grossman

1970 ◽  
Vol 70 (1, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 87-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliott M. Blass ◽  
Donald G. Hanson
Keyword(s):  

1972 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Gottheil ◽  
Lacey O. Corbett ◽  
Joseph C. Grasberger ◽  
Floyd S. Cornelison

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document