Propagation and localization of Rossby waves over random topography (two-layer model)

Wave Motion ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.I. Klyatskin ◽  
N.V. Gryanik ◽  
D. Gurarie
Keyword(s):  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Layer Model ◽  
Two Layer Model

External Rossby Waves in the Two-Layer Model

1987 ◽  
Vol 44 (20) ◽  
pp. 2924-2933 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Lee Panetta ◽  
Isaac M. Held ◽  
Raymond T. Pierrehumbert
Keyword(s):  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Layer Model ◽  
Two Layer Model

Coherent structures of nonlinear barotropic-baroclinic interaction in unequal depth two-layer model

2021 ◽  
Vol 408 ◽  
pp. 126347
Author(s):  
Jiaqi Zhang ◽  
Ruigang Zhang ◽  
Liangui Yang ◽  
Quansheng Liu ◽  
Liguo Chen
Keyword(s):  
Coherent Structures ◽  
Layer Model ◽  
Two Layer Model

Permafrost mapping by audiofrequency magnetotellurics

1978 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 1539-1546 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Koziar ◽  
D. W. Strangway
Keyword(s):  
Mackenzie Delta ◽  
Conductive Layer ◽  
Frequency Range ◽  
Layer Model ◽  
Resistive Layer ◽  
Asymptotic Models ◽  
Two Layer Model ◽  
Electrical Methods ◽  
Permafrost Mapping ◽  
Lateral Variations

The audiofrequency magnetotelluric (AMT) method has been used to study permafrost thickness near Tuktoyaktuk, N.W.T. in the Mackenzie Delta. In the frequency range of 10 Hz–10 kHz the permafrost behaves as a simple resistive layer over a conductive layer. This simple two-layer model can be inverted by asymptotic models to give a unique value for the thickness of the highly resistive frozen layer. In areas of simple layering, these results correlate well with drilling. In areas of sharp lateral variations in resistivity, depths tend to be underestimated. Unlike other electrical methods, AMT is not hampered by the presence of a surface melt layer in the summer if the conductivity–thickness product of this 'active layer' is less than about 0.03 mho (0.03 S).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document