Decreased left atrial appendage function is an important predictor of elevated left ventricular filling pressure in patients with congestive heart failure

1999 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Heng Li ◽  
Liang-Miin Tsai ◽  
Wei-Chuan Tsai ◽  
Ting-Hsing Chao ◽  
Li-Jen Lin ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Khan ◽  
K Inoue ◽  
E.W Remme ◽  
O.S Andersen ◽  
E Gude ◽  
...  

Abstract Background When evaluating left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) according to current guidelines, tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity is often not available. Purpose In the present study we investigate if left atrial (LA) reservoir strain may be used instead of TR velocity for evaluation of LVFP. Methods We performed a prospective, multicenter, multinational and multivendor study in an all comer population of 322 patients with suspected heart failure or other cardiovascular disease where LVFP was measured by right- or left heart catheterization, as pulmonary capillary wedge pressure or pre-A LV diastolic pressure, respectively. Echocardiography was performed within 1 day of catheterization. 101 patients classified as special populations in the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations (i.e. non-cardiac pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation, hypertrophic and restrictive cardiomyopathies) were excluded. Of the remaining 221 patients, 118 patients had EF ≥50% and 103 patients had EF <50%. Regression analysis was performed for LA reservoir strain and TR velocity against LVFP. LA reservoir strain at a cut-off value of <18% was applied instead of TR velocity in the 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm and compared with the current algorithm. Results LA reservoir strain correlated better with LVFP than TR velocity, r=0.62 vs 0.40 (p<0.01) (Figure 1). When replacing TR velocity with LA reservoir strain, the feasibility of the ASE/EACVI 2016 algorithm increased from 91.8% to 98.1%. The accuracy of the algorithm was not significantly altered (80% vs 79%). An accuracy of 80% for the algorithm is lower than what has been reported in earlier publications, this may be due to inclusion of patients without suspected heart failure and no assessment of clinical data, which in turn may have influenced the accuracy of the algorithm. Conclusion LA reservoir strain has better correlation to LVFP than TR velocity, and can be used in the ASE/EACVI 2016 algorithm for estimation of LVFP as a replacement when TR velocity is missing. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F H Khan ◽  
O S Andersen ◽  
E Gude ◽  
H Skulstad ◽  
O A Smiseth ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The current algorithm in the 2016 recommendations for echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) as normal or elevated, combines traditional indices of mitral inflow velocities, tissue Doppler, left atrial volume and tricuspid regurgitation velocity (Figure A). Some of the patients remain unclassified by this algorithm. Left atrial (LA) strain is a novel index that correlates well with LVFP and may improve estimation of LVFP in these patients. Purpose We tested if LA strain can improve estimation of LVFP for the patients that are unclassified by the 2016 algorithm. Methods We analyzed data from 100 patients who were referred to right heart catheterization due to unexplained dyspnea or suspected heart failure. Echocardiography was performed simultaneously with or within 24 hours of right heart catheterization. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was used as an estimate for LVFP and defined as elevated if above 12 mmHg. Elevated LVFP was first estimated using the 2016 algorithm. In patients who were unclassified by the algorithm due to conflicting indices or unattainable indices, LA strain was subsequently used to detect elevated LVFP using a cut-off found from ROC analysis of the whole cohort. Results Six patients were unclassified by the 2016 algorithm. The ROC analysis of all 100 patients showed that at an LA strain cut-off of above or below 16.2%, LVFP was correctly classified as normal or elevated, respectively, with a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 88%. All 6 unclassified patients by the 2016 algorithm were correctly classified using the LA strain cut-off, effectively increasing the accuracy of the algorithm by 6 percentage points. Conclusions LA strain may have a role in non-invasive estimation of LVFP, particularly in patients who remain unclassified when using the conventional echocardiographic indices. Acknowledgement/Funding South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document