scholarly journals The breakdown behavior of the maximum likelihood estimator in the logistic regression model

2002 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Croux ◽  
Cécile Flandre ◽  
Gentiane Haesbroeck
2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. LI ◽  
J. ZHOU ◽  
L. WANG

In this paper, the non-parametric bootstrap and non-parametric Bayesian bootstrap methods are applied for parameter estimation in the binary logistic regression model. A real data study and a simulation study are conducted to compare the Nonparametric bootstrap, Non-parametric Bayesian bootstrap and the maximum likelihood methods. Study results shows that three methods are all effective ways for parameter estimation in the binary logistic regression model. In small sample case, the non-parametric Bayesian bootstrap method performs relatively better than the non-parametric bootstrap and the maximum likelihood method for parameter estimation in the binary logistic regression model.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2106 (1) ◽  
pp. 012001
Author(s):  
P R Sihombing ◽  
S R Rohimah ◽  
A Kurnia

Abstract This study aims to compare the efficacy of logistic regression model for identifying the risk factors of low-birth-weight babies in Indonesia using the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE)and the Bayesian estimation methods. The data used in this study is secondary data derived from the 2017 Indonesian Demographic Health Survey with a total sample of 16,344 newborn babies. Selection of the best logistic regression model was based on the smaller Bayesian Schwartz Information Criterion (BIC) value. The logistic regression model with the Bayesian estimation method has a smaller BIC value than the MLE method. Twin births, baby girl, maternal age at risk, birth spacing that is too close, iron deficiency, low education, low economy, inadequate drinking water sources have provided a higher risk of low-birth-weight incidence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document