103 TECHNIQUES FOR IMAGE BASED IN-VIVO DOSIMETRY: FROM PARTICLE THERAPY PET TO IN-BEAM PROMPT GAMMA IMAGING

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. S40-S41
Author(s):  
F. Fiedler ◽  
U. Dersch ◽  
C. Golnik ◽  
S. Helmbrecht ◽  
T. Kormoll ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Chacon ◽  
Marissa Kielly ◽  
Harley Rutherford ◽  
Daniel R. Franklin ◽  
Anita Caracciolo ◽  
...  

Abstract Neutron Capture Enhanced Particle Therapy (NCEPT) boosts the effectiveness of particle therapy by capturing thermal neutrons produced by beam-target nuclear interactions in and around the treatment site, using tumour-specific 10B or 157Gd-based neutron capture agents. Neutron captures release high-LET secondary particles together with prompt gamma photons with energies of 478 keV (10B) or 7.94 MeV (157Gd). A key requirement for NCEPT’s translation is the development of in vivo dosimetry techniques which can measure both the direct ion dose and the dose due to neutron capture. In this work, we report signatures which can be used to discriminate between photons resulting from neutron capture and those originating from other processes. A Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation study into timing and energy thresholds for discrimination of prompt gamma photons resulting from thermal neutron capture during NCEPT was conducted. Three simulated 300×300×300 mm3 cubic PMMA targets were irradiated by 4He or 12C ion beams with a spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) depth range of 60 mm; one target is homogeneous while the others include 10×10×10 mm3 neutron capture inserts (NCIs) of pure 10B or 157Gd located at the distal edge of the SOBP. The arrival times of photons and neutrons entering a simulated 50×50×50 mm3 ideal detector were recorded. The majority of photons resulting from neutron capture were found to arrive at the detector at least 60 ns later than photons created by other processes. A range of candidate detector and thermal neutron shielding materials were simulated, and detections meeting the proposed acceptance criteria (i.e. falling within the target energy window and arriving 60 ns post beam-off) were classified as true or false positives, depending on their origin. The ratio of true / false positives (RTF) was calculated; for targets with 10B and 157Gd NCIs, the detector materials which resulted in the highest RTF were cadmium-shielded CdTe and boron-shielded LSO, respectively. The optimal irradiation period for both carbon and helium ions was 1 µs for the 10B NCI and 1 ms for the 157Gd NCI.


2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunhe Xie ◽  
El Hassane Bentefour ◽  
Guillaume Janssens ◽  
Julien Smeets ◽  
François Vander Stappen ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. S44
Author(s):  
F. Hueso-González ◽  
D. Bemmerer ◽  
M. Berthel ◽  
A.K. Biegun ◽  
J.v. Borany ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5606
Author(s):  
Vimal Kant Pandey ◽  
Cher Ming Tan ◽  
Vivek Sangwan

Prompt gamma imaging is one of the emerging techniques used in proton therapy for in-vivo range verification. Prompt gamma signals are generated during therapy due to the nuclear interaction between beam particles and nuclei of the tissue that is detected and processed in order to obtain the position and energy of the event so that the benefits of Bragg’s peak can be fully utilized. This work aims to develop a gallium nitride (GaN)-based readout system for position-sensitive detectors. An operational amplifier is the module most used in such a system to process the detector signal, and a GaN-based operational amplifier (OPA) is designed and simulated in LTSpice. The designed circuit had an open-loop gain of 70 dB and a unity gain frequency of 34 MHz. The slew rate of OPA was 20 V/μs and common mode rejection ratio was 84.2 dB. A simulation model of the readout circuit system using the GaN-based operational amplifier was also designed, and the result showed that the system can successfully process the prompt gamma signals. Due to the radiation hardness of GaN devices, the readout circuit system is expected to be more reliable than its silicon counterpart.


2015 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. S271-S272
Author(s):  
E. Sterpin ◽  
G. Janssens ◽  
J. Smeets ◽  
F. Vander Stappen ◽  
D. Prieels ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (6Part43) ◽  
pp. 3726-3726
Author(s):  
E Sterpin ◽  
G Janssens ◽  
J Smeets ◽  
F Vander Stappen ◽  
M Priegnitz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. S296-S297
Author(s):  
C. Khamfongkhruea ◽  
G. Janssens ◽  
J. Petzoldt ◽  
J. Smeets ◽  
G. Pausch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document