scholarly journals PO-0743: Stereotactic body radiotherapy in recurrent lymph nodes metastases from prostate cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. S347
Author(s):  
F. Trippa ◽  
E. Maranzano ◽  
E. Ponti ◽  
A. Carosi ◽  
F. Arcidiacono ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 228-228
Author(s):  
Martin Schumacher ◽  
Fiona C. Burkhard ◽  
Regula Markwalder ◽  
Urs E. Studer

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Ingrosso ◽  
Fabio Trippa ◽  
Ernesto Maranzano ◽  
Alessandra Carosi ◽  
Elisabetta Ponti ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Schumacher ◽  
F. Burkhard ◽  
R. Markwalder ◽  
U. Studer

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. e623-e632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa ◽  
Giuseppe Fanetti ◽  
Cristiana Fodor ◽  
Delia Ciardo ◽  
Luigi Santoro ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mami Ogita ◽  
Hideomi Yamashita ◽  
Yuki Nozawa ◽  
Sho Ozaki ◽  
Subaru Sawayanagi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The efficacy of a hydrogel spacer in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has not been clarified. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of SBRT in combination with a hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer. Methods This is a prospective single-center, single-arm phase II study. Prostate cancer patients without lymph node or distant metastasis were eligible. All patients received a hydrogel spacer insertion, followed by SBRT of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions with volumetric modulated arc therapy. The primary endpoint was physician-assessed acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity within 3 months. The secondary endpoints were physician-assessed acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity, patient-reported outcomes evaluated by the EPIC and FACT-P questionnaires, and dosimetric comparison. We used propensity score-matched analyses to compare patients with the hydrogel spacer with those without the spacer. The historical data of the control without a hydrogel spacer was obtained from our hospital’s electronic records. Results Forty patients were enrolled between February 2017 and July 2018. A hydrogel spacer significantly reduced the dose to the rectum. Grade 2 acute GI and GU toxicity occurred in seven (18%) and 17 (44%) patients. The EPIC bowel and urinary summary score declined from the baseline to the first month (P < 0.01, < 0.01), yet it was still significantly lower in the third month (P < 0.01, P = 0.04). For propensity score-matched analyses, no significant differences in acute GI and GU toxicity were observed between the two groups. The EPIC bowel summary score was significantly better in the spacer group at 1 month (82.2 in the spacer group and 68.5 in the control group). Conclusions SBRT with a hydrogel spacer had the dosimetric benefits of reducing the rectal doses. The use of the hydrogel spacer did not reduce physician-assessed acute toxicity, but it improved patient-reported acute bowel toxicity. Trial registration: Trial registration: UMIN-CTR, UMIN000026213. Registered 19 February 2017, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000029385.


2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S290
Author(s):  
J. Mohajer ◽  
A. Dunlop ◽  
A. Mitchell ◽  
S. Nill ◽  
U. Oelfke ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document