scholarly journals SP-0356: 4D image acquisition: 4D-MRI based evaluation of moving lung tumour target volumes

2018 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. S184
Author(s):  
M. McGarry
Mutagenesis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Badding ◽  
B Bhaskar Gollapudi ◽  
Sean Gehen ◽  
Zhongyu (June) Yan

Abstract 1,3-Dichloropropene (1,3-D; CAS No. 542-75-6) is a soil fumigant used for the control of nematodes in agriculture. There is an extensive database on the genotoxicity of 1,3-D and many of the published studies are confounded by the presence of mutagenic stabilisers in the test substance. Mixed results were obtained in the in vitro assays, often due to the purity of the 1,3-D sample tested. In order to get further clarity, the mutagenic potential of 1,3-D was investigated in vivo in the transgenic Big Blue rodent models. Inhalation exposure of 150 ppm 1,3-D (×2.5 tumourigenic dose) to transgenic male B6C3F1 mice did not induce lacI mutations in either the lung (tumour target tissue) or liver. Similarly, dietary administration of 1,3-D up to 50 mg/kg/day to transgenic male Fischer 344 rats did not increase the cII mutant frequency in either the liver (tumour target) or kidney. These results, along with other available in vivo data, including the absence of DNA adducts and clastogenic/aneugenic potential, support the conclusion that 1,3-D is efficiently detoxified in vivo and, as such, does not pose a mutagenic hazard or risk.


2017 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. S36-S37
Author(s):  
M. Düsberg ◽  
S. Neppl ◽  
S. Gerum ◽  
F. Roeder ◽  
M. Reiner ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 101902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yilin Liu ◽  
Fang-Fang Yin ◽  
Zheng Chang ◽  
Brian G. Czito ◽  
Manisha Palta ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (6Part3) ◽  
pp. 3622-3622
Author(s):  
Y Qin ◽  
Z Chang ◽  
W Segars ◽  
F Yin ◽  
J Cai

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S731-S733
Author(s):  
B. Eiben ◽  
E. Chandy ◽  
A. Abravan ◽  
V. Rompokos ◽  
H. Grimes ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 36 (15) ◽  
pp. 81-82
Author(s):  
E.M.C. Wong ◽  
K.Y. Oh ◽  
Y.K. See ◽  
S.Y. Tsao

Author(s):  
Brian Cross

A relatively new entry, in the field of microscopy, is the Scanning X-Ray Fluorescence Microscope (SXRFM). Using this type of instrument (e.g. Kevex Omicron X-ray Microprobe), one can obtain multiple elemental x-ray images, from the analysis of materials which show heterogeneity. The SXRFM obtains images by collimating an x-ray beam (e.g. 100 μm diameter), and then scanning the sample with a high-speed x-y stage. To speed up the image acquisition, data is acquired "on-the-fly" by slew-scanning the stage along the x-axis, like a TV or SEM scan. To reduce the overhead from "fly-back," the images can be acquired by bi-directional scanning of the x-axis. This results in very little overhead with the re-positioning of the sample stage. The image acquisition rate is dominated by the x-ray acquisition rate. Therefore, the total x-ray image acquisition rate, using the SXRFM, is very comparable to an SEM. Although the x-ray spatial resolution of the SXRFM is worse than an SEM (say 100 vs. 2 μm), there are several other advantages.


Author(s):  
James F. Mancuso

IBM PC compatible computers are widely used in microscopy for applications ranging from control to image acquisition and analysis. The choice of IBM-PC based systems over competing computer platforms can be based on technical merit alone or on a number of factors relating to economics, availability of peripherals, management dictum, or simple personal preference.IBM-PC got a strong “head start” by first dominating clerical, document processing and financial applications. The use of these computers spilled into the laboratory where the DOS based IBM-PC replaced mini-computers. Compared to minicomputer, the PC provided a more for cost-effective platform for applications in numerical analysis, engineering and design, instrument control, image acquisition and image processing. In addition, the sitewide use of a common PC platform could reduce the cost of training and support services relative to cases where many different computer platforms were used. This could be especially true for the microscopists who must use computers in both the laboratory and the office.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document