PO-1703: Renal positional probability mapping using ultra-fast volumetric 4D-MRI for MRgRT

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S939-S940
Author(s):  
J. Yuan ◽  
O.L. Wong ◽  
R.Y.W. Ho ◽  
Y. Zhou ◽  
K.Y. Cheung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 900-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Born ◽  
Matthias Pfeifle ◽  
Michael Markl ◽  
Matthias Gutberlet ◽  
Gerik Scheuermann
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongxin Deng ◽  
Brendan Wallace ◽  
Derek Maassen ◽  
Johnathan Werner

AbstractA geographical information system (GIS) perspective is taken to examine conceptual and methodological complications present in tornado density and probability mapping. Tornado density is defined as the inverse-distance-weighted count of tornado touchdown points or tornado-affected cells within a neighborhood area. The paper first adds a few geographic elements into the tornado definition and then characterizes tornado density as a density field in GIS that depends on predefined, modifiable areas to exist. Tornado density is therefore conceptually distinguished from both individual tornadoes and tornado probability. Three factors are identified to be vital in tornado density mapping: the neighborhood size, the distance decay function, and the choice of tornado properties. Correspondingly, 12 neighborhood sizes ranging from 20 to 360 km are tested, four distance decay functions are compared, and two tornado properties—tornado touchdown locations and pathlengths—are separately incorporated in mapping. GIS interpretations, clarifications, and demonstrations are provided for these factors to reach a thorough understanding of how the factors function and affect the resultant tornado density maps. Historical tornado data of the eastern half of the United States from 1973 to 2013 are used in these demonstrations. Uncertainty and propagation analyses are recommended for future tornado density and probability mapping, and a Monte Carlo simulation using tornado pathlength data is conducted as an example of uncertainty modeling. In all, tornado density mapping is diagnosed as a largely subjective activity, and the mapper needs to make multiple choices according to the mapping purpose, scale, and the involved tornado record data.


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 075002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Breuer ◽  
Cord B Meyer ◽  
Felix A Breuer ◽  
Anne Richter ◽  
Florian Exner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
A. van de Lindt ◽  
B. Nowee ◽  
T. Janssen ◽  
C. Schneider ◽  
P. Remeijer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ahmed Serkan Emekli ◽  
Ersin Ersözlü ◽  
Mehmed Akif Emekli ◽  
Tuncay Gündüz ◽  
Murat Kürtüncü

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 01NT02 ◽  
Author(s):  
R J M Navest ◽  
S Mandija ◽  
T Bruijnen ◽  
B Stemkens ◽  
R H N Tijssen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document