O.42 Liver damage in total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in infants and children

1983 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
E. Goroatiza ◽  
D. Feldmann ◽  
J.P. Dommergue ◽  
N. Lambert-Zechovsky ◽  
P. Danel ◽  
...  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-448
Author(s):  
Alan N. Langnas ◽  
B. W. Shaw ◽  
Dean L. Antonson ◽  
Stuart S. Kaufman ◽  
David R. Mack ◽  
...  

Objective. This report discusses the preliminary experience with intestinal transplantation in children at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Patients. During the past 4 years, 16 intestinal transplants have been performed in infants and children. Thirteen have been combined liver and bowel transplants, and the remainder were isolated intestinal transplants. Nearly half of the patients were younger than 1 year of age at the time of surgery, and the vast majority were younger than 5 years of age. All but one had short bowel syndrome. Results. The 1-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates for recipients of liver and small bowel transplants were 76% and 61%, respectively. Eight of 13 patients who received liver and small bowel transplants remain alive at the time of this writing, with a mean length of follow-up of 263 (range, 7 to 1223) days. Six patients are currently free of total parenteral nutrition. All three patients receiving isolated intestinal transplants are alive and free of parenteral nutrition. The mean length of follow-up is 384 (range, 330 to 450) days. Major complications have included severe infections and rejection. Lymphoproliferative disease, graft-versus-host disease, and chylous ascites have not been major problems. Conclusions. Although intestinal transplantation is in its infancy, these preliminary results suggest combined liver and bowel transplants and isolated intestinal transplantation may be viable options for some patients with intestinal failure caused by short bowel syndrome or other gastrointestinal disease in whom long-term total parenteral nutrition is not an attractive option.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 654-655
Author(s):  
WILLIAM F. WALSH

The article "Evaluation of a Pediatric Multiple Vitamin Preparation For Total Parenteral Nutrition in Infants and Children" by Moore et al (Pediatrics 1986; 77:530-538) confused me. The study of vitamin levels is crucial to making recommendations, but why would the authors choose to give all premature infants 65% of the recommended dose for infants and children, when the package insert clearly states, "Infants less than 1 kg: the daily dose should not exceed 30% of the contents. Do not exceed this daily dose"?


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-547
Author(s):  
H. L. Greene ◽  
M. E. Courtney Moore ◽  
B. Phillips ◽  
L. Franck ◽  
R. J. Shulman ◽  
...  

This study represents the first attempt to evaluate the American Medical Association Nutrition Advisory Group (NAG) recommendations for intravenous vitamin A, D, and E dosages for infants and children. Patients studied included 18 preterm infants (group 1) and 26 term infants and children (group 2A) receiving total parenteral nutrition for 2 to 4 weeks and eight infants and children receiving total parenteral nutrition for 3 to 6 months (group 2B). Term gestation infants and children up to 11 years of age all received the same dosages (those that were recommended by the NAG for children weighing more than 10 kg). Preterm infants received 65% of these doses. In group 1, cord blood α-tocopherol levels were <0.22 mg/dL in seven preterm infants (reference value = 0.29 ± 0.04), but mean levels increased to 1.65 ± 0.17 mg/dL after four days of treatment. Eight infants consistently received additional vitamin E orally (80 to 150 mg daily), and their levels increased to 2.18 ± 0.26 mg/dL by four days of study and to 3.49 ± 0.57 mg/dL after 3 weeks. Oral supplementation in the preterm infants appeared to be unnecessary because intravenous vitamins alone maintained levels above 1.1 mg/dL. In group 2, α-tocopherol levels were maintained within the reference range. Patients receiving lipid emulsions containing substantial quantities of α-tocopherol had significantly higher blood levels than patients receiving lipid emulsions containing little α-tocopherol (P < .01). Mean 25-OH vitamin D levels were mintained above or within the reference range in groups 2A and 2B. Although only seven patients in group 1 had measurements performed after beginning total parenteral nutrition, their 25-OH vitamin D levels increased during total parenteral nutrition and were maintained within the reference range. Mean vitamin A levels in group 2 were maintained within the reference range of 23.5 ± 1.8 µg/dL, although three of eight patients in group 2A who had levels 2 SD less than the reference mean levels initially did not increase their levels during the 2-week period of treatment. Patients on home total parenteral nutrition (group 2B) showed a mean increase in retinol, from 29.2 ± 3.0 µg/dL to 37.4 ± 7.1 µg/dL. There was also good correlation between retinol-binding protein and retinol in all patients in group 2. Premature infant (group 1) levels were 13.9 ± 1.3 µg/dL initially (reference value = 15.7 µg/dL) and did not change after 28 days of treatment (13.5 ± 2.5 µg/dL). In addition, there was poor correlation with retinol-binding protein. The failure of retinol to increase with treatment may be secondary to losses of retinol in the delivery system. Further studies are needed to better define vitamin A and D needs during parenteral feeding of premature infants, although the dosage levels in term infants appear to maintain mean blood levels of all of the vitamins within the reference range.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document