On the law of turbulent entrainment across a density interface

1996 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
J Tanny
1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74
Author(s):  
J Tanny ◽  
A Chai ◽  
E Kit

1977 ◽  
Vol 79 (04) ◽  
pp. 753 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. H. Kantha ◽  
O. M. Phillips ◽  
R. S. Azad

2015 ◽  
Vol 779 ◽  
pp. 116-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay B. Shrinivas ◽  
Gary R. Hunt

In pursuit of a universal law for the rate of entrainment across a density interface driven by the impingement of a localised turbulent flow, the role of the confinement, wherein the environment is within the confines of a box, has to date been overlooked. Seeking to unravel the effects of confinement, we develop a phenomenological model describing the quasi-steady rate at which buoyant fluid is turbulently entrained across a density interface separating two uniform layers within the confines of a box. The upper layer is maintained by a turbulent plume, and the localised impingement of a turbulent fountain with the interface drives entrainment of fluid from the upper layer into the lower layer. The plume and fountain rise from sources at the base of the box and are non-interacting. Guided by previous observations, our model characterises the dynamics of fountain–interface interaction and the steady secondary flow in the environment that is induced by the perpetual cycle of vertical excursions of the interface. We reveal that the dimensionless entrainment flux across the interface $E_{i}$ is governed not only by an interfacial Froude number $\mathit{Fr}_{i}$ but also by a ‘confinement’ parameter ${\it\lambda}_{i}$, which characterises the length scale of interfacial turbulence relative to the depth of the upper layer. By deducing the range of ${\it\lambda}_{i}$ that may be regarded as ‘small’ and ‘large’, we shed new light on the effects of confinement on interfacial entrainment. We establish that for small ${\it\lambda}_{i}$, a weak secondary flow has little influence on $E_{i}$, which follows a quadratic power law $E_{i}\propto \mathit{Fr}_{i}^{2}$. For large ${\it\lambda}_{i}$, a strong secondary flow significantly influences $E_{i}$, which then follows a cubic power law $E_{i}\propto \mathit{Fr}_{i}^{3}$. Drawing on these results, and showing that for previous experimental studies ${\it\lambda}_{i}$ exhibits wide variation, we highlight underlying physical reasons for the significant scatter in the existing measurements of the rate of interfacial entrainment. Finally, we explore the implications of our results for guiding appropriate choices of box geometry for experimentally and numerically examining interfacial entrainment.


1973 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Wu

Turbulent entrainment across a density interface is studied in a laboratory wind–wave tank in which a stably stratified system consisting of two homogeneous fluid layers is introduced. The results indicate that the rate of change of the potential energy of the mixing layer is proportional to the rate of work done by the wind. However, only a very small fraction of the work done by the wind is used for interfacial mixing or developing a seasonal thermocline. A formula relating the entrainment rate to the density stratification and the wind-friction velocity is derived from the experimental results.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Leslie ◽  
Mary Casper

“My patient refuses thickened liquids, should I discharge them from my caseload?” A version of this question appears at least weekly on the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Community pages. People talk of respecting the patient's right to be non-compliant with speech-language pathology recommendations. We challenge use of the word “respect” and calling a patient “non-compliant” in the same sentence: does use of the latter term preclude the former? In this article we will share our reflections on why we are interested in these so called “ethical challenges” from a personal case level to what our professional duty requires of us. Our proposal is that the problems that we encounter are less to do with ethical or moral puzzles and usually due to inadequate communication. We will outline resources that clinicians may use to support their work from what seems to be a straightforward case to those that are mired in complexity. And we will tackle fears and facts regarding litigation and the law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document