Optimal monetary policy responses to relative-price changes

2001 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Aoki
2005 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tack Yun

This paper analyzes optimal monetary policy in a sticky price model with Calvo-type staggered price-setting. In the paper, the optimal monetary policy maximizes the expected utility of a representative household without having to rely on a set of linearly approximated equilibrium conditions, given the distortions associated with the staggered price-setting. It shows that the complete stabilization of the price level is optimal in the absence of initial price dispersion, while optimal inflation targets respond to changes in the level of relative price distortion in the presence of initial price dispersion.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Ravenna ◽  
Carl E Walsh

We derive a linear-quadratic model that is consistent with sticky prices and search and matching frictions in the labor market. We show that the second-order approximation to the welfare of the representative agent depends on inflation and “gaps” that involve current and lagged unemployment. Our approximation makes explicit how welfare costs are generated by the presence of search frictions. These costs are distinct from the costs associated with relative price dispersion and fluctuations in consumption that appear in standard new Keynesian models. We show the labor market structure has important implications for optimal monetary policy. (JEL E24, E31, E52)


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karsten Jeske ◽  
Zheng Liu

Housing is an important component of the consumption basket. Because both rental prices and goods prices are sticky, the literature suggests that optimal monetary policy should stabilize both types of prices, with the optimal weight on rental inflation proportional to the housing expenditure share. In a two-sector DSGE model with sticky rental prices and goods prices, however, we find that the optimal weight on rental inflation in the Taylor rule is small—much smaller than that implied by the housing expenditure share. We show that the asymmetry in policy responses to rent inflation versus goods inflation stems from the asymmetry in factor intensity between the two sectors.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Costas Azariadis ◽  
James Bullard ◽  
Aarti Singh ◽  
Jacek Suda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document