scholarly journals INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND USE FOR STENT OPTIMIZATION AND 1-YEAR OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CTO-PCI: INSIGHTS FROM THE PROGRESS-CTO REGISTRY

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 1117
Author(s):  
Evangelia Vemmou ◽  
Jaikirshan Khatri ◽  
Anthony Doing ◽  
Philip Dattilo ◽  
Catalin Toma ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myeong-Ki Hong ◽  
Cheol Whan Lee ◽  
June-Hong Kim ◽  
Young-Hak Kim ◽  
Jong-Min Song ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daehoon Kim ◽  
Byeong-Keuk Kim ◽  
Seung-Jun Lee ◽  
Sung-jin Hong ◽  
Chul-min Ahn ◽  
...  

Introduction: Achieving stent optimization on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is associated with favorable clinical outcomes in new-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) implantation. Little is known about the stent optimization criteria in lesion subsets assorted according to vessel size and lesion length. Hypothesis: We hypothesized lesion-specific IVUS criteria could provide a better prediction for the outcomes after DES implantation for diffuse coronary lesions. Methods: From four randomized trials comparing IVUS and angiography guidance in long coronary lesions, a total of 1,194 patients who underwent IVUS-guided intervention with DESs ≥26 mm in length were included. Primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 1 year following intervention. Results: MACE occurred in 41 (3.4%) patients. Among possible combinations of absolute and relative expansion criteria, the combination best predicting MACE was minimal stent area (MSA) ≥5.4 mm 2 or 80% of mean lumen area (MLA) (Youden index=0.250) in overall patients. In 2x2 factorial subgroup analyses, the MSA cutoff was 4.9 mm 2 or 85% of MLA for shorter (<30 mm) lesions with a smaller vessel diameter (reference vessel diameter [RVD] <3.0 mm) (Index=0.616) and 5.6 mm 2 or 85% for shorter lesions with a larger vessel diameter (RVD ≥3.0 mm) (Index=0.211). In longer lesions (≥30 mm), the MSA cutoff was 5.5 mm 2 or 70% of MLA for smaller vessels (RVD <3.0 mm) (Index=0.469), and 6.2 mm 2 or 70% for larger vessels (RVD ≥3.0 mm) (Index=0.578). Conclusions: When IVUS is used to optimize DES implantations for long coronary stenoses, applying different criteria according to angiographic parameters might improve the outcomes. In relatively longer lesions with a larger vessel diameter, pursuing to achieve a higher absolute MSA value rather than relative expansion might be more important.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. S43
Author(s):  
Patrick C. Magnus ◽  
John E. Jayne ◽  
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia ◽  
Swart Michael ◽  
Gerrit-Anne van Es ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Li ◽  
Giuseppe D’Amico ◽  
Cristiano Quintini ◽  
Teresa Diago Uso ◽  
Sameer Gadani ◽  
...  

Summary: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been used extensively in coronary applications. Its use in venous applications has increased as endovascular therapy has increasingly become the mainstay therapy for central venous diseases. IVUS has been used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in managing venous stenotic disease, venous occlusive disease, and IVC filter placement and removal. IVUS has been proven to be effective in providing detailed measurement of the venous anatomy, which aid in determining the appropriate size and the approach for venous stent placement. In IVC filter placement, IVUS can provide detailed measurement and guide IVC filter placement in emergent and critical care settings. It also has certain utility in filter removal. At any rate, to date there are only a few studies examining its impact on patient outcomes. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted in the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document