Vasovagal Syncope: Differences Between Passive Tilt and Isoproterenol Tilt Table Testing

1998 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 227A
Author(s):  
W Shen
Heart ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
S W Parry ◽  
P Reeve ◽  
J Lawson ◽  
F E Shaw ◽  
J Davison ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve W. Parry ◽  
Janine C. Gray ◽  
Julia L. Newton ◽  
Pamela Reeve ◽  
Diarmuid O'shea ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas L. DePace ◽  
Julie A. Bateman ◽  
Michael Yayac ◽  
John Oh ◽  
Mushfiqur Siddique ◽  
...  

Syncope is difficult to definitively diagnose, even with tilt-table testing and beat-to-beat blood pressure measurements, the gold-standard. Both are qualitative, subjective assessments. There are subtypes of syncope associated with autonomic conditions for which tilt-table testing is not useful. Heart rate variability analyses also include too much ambiguity. Three subtypes of syncope are differentiated: vasovagal syncope (VVS) due to parasympathetic excess (VVS-PE), VVS with abnormal heart rate response (VVS-HR), and VVS without PE (VVS-PN). P&S monitoring (ANSAR, Inc., Philadelphia, PA) differentiates subtypes in 2727 cardiology patients (50.5% female; average age: 57 years; age range: 12–100 years), serially tested over four years (3.3 tests per patient, average). P&S monitoring noninvasively, independently, and simultaneously measures parasympathetic and sympathetic (P&S) activity, including the normal P-decrease followed by an S-increase with head-up postural change (standing). Syncope, as an S-excess (SE) with stand, is differentiated from orthostatic dysfunction (e.g., POTS) as S-withdrawal with stand. Upon standing, VVS-PE is further differentiated as SE with PE, VVS-HR as SE with abnormal HR, and VVS-PN as SE with normal P- and HR-responses. Improved understanding of the underlying pathophysiology by more accurate subtyping leads to more precise therapy and improved outcomes.


2021 ◽  
pp. 263246362110501
Author(s):  
Ameya Udyavar ◽  
Saurabh Deshpande

Syncope is a symptom that is commonly encountered in the practice and may point to a cardiac or neurological diagnosis. The evaluation of syncope rests on a thorough clinical evaluation, aided by electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, followed by risk stratification of the particular case. Once high-risk factors have been ruled out, the patient can be further diagnosed as having a reflex syncope (RS), orthostatic hypotension, or cardiac syncope based on specific clues. If the initial evaluation is not confirmatory various diagnostic tests may be used to guide further management (eg, long-term ECG monitoring, tilt table testing, etc). The management should be based on the overall profile of the patient and not only on any single test. In this review, we discuss the evaluation of a patient with RS and give an overview of treatments available for the patients.


1993 ◽  
Vol 72 (17) ◽  
pp. 1286-1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith G. Lurie ◽  
John Dutton ◽  
Ripdeep Mangat ◽  
David Newman ◽  
Susan Eisenberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document