scholarly journals Evaluation and Management of Reflex Vasovagal Syncope—A Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 263246362110501
Author(s):  
Ameya Udyavar ◽  
Saurabh Deshpande

Syncope is a symptom that is commonly encountered in the practice and may point to a cardiac or neurological diagnosis. The evaluation of syncope rests on a thorough clinical evaluation, aided by electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, followed by risk stratification of the particular case. Once high-risk factors have been ruled out, the patient can be further diagnosed as having a reflex syncope (RS), orthostatic hypotension, or cardiac syncope based on specific clues. If the initial evaluation is not confirmatory various diagnostic tests may be used to guide further management (eg, long-term ECG monitoring, tilt table testing, etc). The management should be based on the overall profile of the patient and not only on any single test. In this review, we discuss the evaluation of a patient with RS and give an overview of treatments available for the patients.

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minggang Shao ◽  
Zhuhuang Zhou ◽  
Guangyu Bin ◽  
Yanping Bai ◽  
Shuicai Wu

In this paper we proposed a wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) telemonitoring system for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection based on a smartphone and cloud computing. A wearable ECG patch was designed to collect ECG signals and send the signals to an Android smartphone via Bluetooth. An Android APP was developed to display the ECG waveforms in real time and transmit every 30 s ECG data to a remote cloud server. A machine learning (CatBoost)-based ECG classification method was proposed to detect AF in the cloud server. In case of detected AF, the cloud server pushed the ECG data and classification results to the web browser of a doctor. Finally, the Android APP displayed the doctor’s diagnosis for the ECG signals. Experimental results showed the proposed CatBoost classifier trained with 17 selected features achieved an overall F1 score of 0.92 on the test set (n = 7270). The proposed wearable ECG monitoring system may potentially be useful for long-term ECG telemonitoring for AF detection.


Heart ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 95 (5) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
S W Parry ◽  
P Reeve ◽  
J Lawson ◽  
F E Shaw ◽  
J Davison ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve W. Parry ◽  
Janine C. Gray ◽  
Julia L. Newton ◽  
Pamela Reeve ◽  
Diarmuid O'shea ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas L. DePace ◽  
Julie A. Bateman ◽  
Michael Yayac ◽  
John Oh ◽  
Mushfiqur Siddique ◽  
...  

Syncope is difficult to definitively diagnose, even with tilt-table testing and beat-to-beat blood pressure measurements, the gold-standard. Both are qualitative, subjective assessments. There are subtypes of syncope associated with autonomic conditions for which tilt-table testing is not useful. Heart rate variability analyses also include too much ambiguity. Three subtypes of syncope are differentiated: vasovagal syncope (VVS) due to parasympathetic excess (VVS-PE), VVS with abnormal heart rate response (VVS-HR), and VVS without PE (VVS-PN). P&S monitoring (ANSAR, Inc., Philadelphia, PA) differentiates subtypes in 2727 cardiology patients (50.5% female; average age: 57 years; age range: 12–100 years), serially tested over four years (3.3 tests per patient, average). P&S monitoring noninvasively, independently, and simultaneously measures parasympathetic and sympathetic (P&S) activity, including the normal P-decrease followed by an S-increase with head-up postural change (standing). Syncope, as an S-excess (SE) with stand, is differentiated from orthostatic dysfunction (e.g., POTS) as S-withdrawal with stand. Upon standing, VVS-PE is further differentiated as SE with PE, VVS-HR as SE with abnormal HR, and VVS-PN as SE with normal P- and HR-responses. Improved understanding of the underlying pathophysiology by more accurate subtyping leads to more precise therapy and improved outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Lopez Ayala ◽  
D Flores ◽  
T Zimmermann ◽  
J Du Fay De Lavallaz ◽  
T Nestelberger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cardiac syncope has been shown to carry the highest hazard for all-cause death compared to other causes of syncope including vasovagal and orthostatic syncope. However, little is known about the incidence, characteristics and prognosis of different cardiac etiologies underlying cardiac syncope. Purpose To evaluate the incidence, characteristics and prognosis of different cardiac etiologies underlying cardiac syncope. Methods We enrolled patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with syncope in a large prospective international multicentre study. The cause of syncope (cardiac vs non-cardiac) including the detailed cardiac aetiology (if cardiac) was centrally adjudicated by two independent cardiologists based on detailed in-hospital as well as outpatient cardiac work-up during 360 days following presentation. Cardiac syncope was classified into four groups: bradyarrhythmia, tachyarrhythmia, structural disease and other (cardiopulmonary and great vessels), as recommended in the ESC Syncope Guidelines. All-cause death during 2-years follow-up was the primary outcome. Results Among 2025 patients presenting with syncope to the ED, cardiac syncope was the final adjudicated diagnoses in 318 (15.7%) patients. The incidence rate of all-cause death among cardiac syncope patients was 103 cases per 1000 person-years. Bradyarrhythmia was the most frequent primary cause of cardiac syncope (n=146, 45.9%) followed by tachyarrhythmia (n=75, 23.6%), structural disease (n=64, 20.1%) and other cardiac (n=26, 8.2%). Patients were 37% female with a median age of 77 years (IQR 67–83) showing no statistically significant difference between subgroups. Clinical characteristics differed significantly among the four subgroups. E.g. syncope occurred during exercise in 12 patients (8.2%) with bradyarrhythmia, 10 patients (13.3%) with tachyarrhythmia, 16 patients (25%) with structural disease, and 5 patients (19%) with other cardiac (p<0.01). Likely of most importance, long-term mortality differed significantly among the four different cardiac subgroups. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) among patients with bradyarrhythmia, tachyarrhythmia, structural disease and other cardiac as compared to patients with vasovagal syncope, the HR were 1.3 (95% CI 0.7–2.5), 4.6 (95% CI 2.3–9.1), 3.1 (95% CI 1.5–6.4) and 5.9 (95% CI 2.3–15.2), respectively (Figure 1). Conclusions Bradyarrhythmia, tachyarrhythmia, and structural cardiac disease are the dominant causes of cardiac syncope. Interestingly, with the appropriate therapy initiated long-term mortality of bradyarrhythmia is comparable to that of vasovagal syncope, while long-term mortality of tachyarrhythmia and structural cardiac disease were substantially increased 3 to 5 fold. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curve Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): The Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the Stiftung für kardiovaskuläre Forschung Basel, the University of Basel and the University Hospital Basel.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document