90 POSTER Combination of serum cytokeratin 19 fragment and Sialyl Lewisx in non-small cell lung cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S28
Author(s):  
S. Mizuguchi ◽  
N. Nishiyama ◽  
T. Iwata ◽  
T. Nishida ◽  
N. Izumi ◽  
...  
Lung Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinjiro Mizuguchi ◽  
Noritoshi Nishiyama ◽  
Takashi Iwata ◽  
Tatsuya Nishida ◽  
Nobuhiro Izumi ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 216-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinjiro Mizuguchi ◽  
Noritoshi Nishiyama ◽  
Takashi Iwata ◽  
Tatsuya Nishida ◽  
Nobuhiro Izumi ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 266 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Kashiwabara ◽  
Hiroyuki Nakamura ◽  
Toshio Kiguchi ◽  
Hisanaga Yagyu ◽  
Koji Kishi ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tamura ◽  
Y. Ohta ◽  
H. Nakamura ◽  
M. Oda ◽  
G. Watanabe

We assessed the diagnostic value of circulating VEGF as a tumor marker in patients with lung cancer and compared its clinical utility with that of other markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA). One hundred and sixty non-small cell lung cancer patients and 70 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Circulating VEGF was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The serum concentrations of both CEA and CYFRA were measured by means of immunoradiometric assays. The diagnostic value of plasma VEGF (VEGFp) was better than that of CYFRA and similar to that of CEA. When the diagnostic value of VEGFp and CEA for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was compared, the two markers proved to have nearly equal discriminatory power. In diagnosing squamous cell carcinoma, VEGFp showed less discrimination than CYFRA. When the diagnostic value of VEGFp was analyzed for stage I adenocarcinoma patients, VEGFp was slightly more discriminatory than CEA. The combination assay of VEGFp and CEA had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 60% at a cutoff of 104.4 pg/mL for VEGFp and 5.2 ng/mL for CEA. The combination of VEGF and CEA was superior to CEA alone in the early diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the lung.


1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Giovanella ◽  
R. Piantanida ◽  
L. Ceriani ◽  
M. Bandera ◽  
R. Novario ◽  
...  

NSE is a biochemical marker for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) diagnosis and management. CYFRA 21.1 is a newly developed immunoassay to detect the serum fragments of cytokeratin 19 which are also expressed in SCLC with or without neurofilaments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance and prognostic role of the two markers in SCLC and their contribution to chemotherapy monitoring and patient follow-up. We studied 62 patients with pathologically proven SCLC: 28 with limited disease (LD) and 34 with extensive disease (ED), and 100 patients with non-malignant pulmonary disease. Immunoradiometric assays (IRMA) were employed to test NSE and CYFRA 21.1 in patients and control subjects. For each patient subset results were expressed as median and interquartile distribution range. NSE and CYFRA 21.1 sensitivity was 0.52 (33/62) and 0.56 (35/62), respectively. In the group of patients with LD, NSE and CYFRA 21.1 sensitivity was 0.42 (12/28) and 0.54 (15/28) and in patients with ED, NSE and CYFRA 21.1 were positive in 0.62 (21/34) and 0.59 (20/34) of cases, respectively. Combining the two markers, a sensitivity of 0.78 (22/28) in LD, 0.82 (28/34) in ED and a global sensitivity of 0.80 (50/62) was obtained. Only NSE was significantly linked to the extension of disease (Mann-Whitney U test p = 0.002) while CYFRA 21.1 did not correlate. The analysis of survival and the evaluation of the two markers at diagnosis showed CYFRA 21.1 to be strongly linked to the patients’ outcome, independently of both clinical prognostic factors and NSE levels (log rank and Cox's model). The markers’ performance during chemotherapy was tested in a group of 33 patients with at least one marker above cut-off. NSE can be considered a reliable marker of tumor mass modifications under chemotherapy, while CYFRA 21.1 expression seems to be relatively independent of tumor volume modifications. An applicable model of biomarkers in SCLC could be the concurrent assay of NSE and CYFRA 21.1 in pre-therapeutic assessment and therapy planning. CYFRA 21.1 does not play an important role during therapy monitoring and follow-up; in these phases NSE alone may be employed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document