The reliability of validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen H. Brady ◽  
Donald S. Garbuz ◽  
Bassam A. Masri ◽  
Clive P. Duncan
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-60
Author(s):  
R.E.T. Enemudo ◽  
E.O. Edomwonyi ◽  
D.O. Odatuwa-Omagbemi ◽  
A.T. Obumse ◽  
M.M. Awa

Objective: To report the outcome of treatment of Types B2 and B3 Post- operative Periprosthetic proximal femoral fracture (PPFF) in four patients treated in Delta State University Teaching Hospital, Oghara, Delta State, using Vancouver classification of Duncan and Masri. Methodology: A retrospective study of four cases managed in this hospital. Information retrieved from case notes were sex, age, duration of prosthesis, treatment given, complications and outcome of treatment. Result: Atotal of 4 patients were reviewed in the study, 2 males and 2 females with a M: F of 1: 1. Duration of the implant before treatment was 5-12 years (mean of 8.3years). Age range was 60-83years (mean of 67.5 years). Two patients had Type B2 and two had Type B3. Average intraoperative blood loss was 1 litre. Duration of surgery was 3-4 hours. Duration of hospital stay was between 3 weeks and 5 months. The complications seen were primary haemorrhage, wound infection, hip dislocation and pulmonaryembolism. The outcome was good for 3 patients and fair in 1, using Harris Hip Score. Conclusion:Vancouver classification of Duncan and Masri is effective in the treatment of PPFF. Key words; Periprosthetic femoral fracture, Long stem hip prosthesis, Vancouver classification, osteolysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204201882110496
Author(s):  
Yoto Oh ◽  
Kouhei Yamamoto ◽  
Toshitaka Yoshii ◽  
Masanobu Kitagawa ◽  
Atsushi Okawa

Stress fractures have traditionally been classified into three categories: fatigue fractures due to overuse of bone with normal elastic resistance; insufficiency fractures due to everyday physiological stress on fragile bone with poor elastic resistance; and pathologic fractures due to bone weakness involving tumors. The concept of atypical fractures has emerged and is considered a type of stress fracture. However, there has been some inconsistency in interpretation when using the traditional classification of stress fractures, and atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) can potentially be classified into subtypes: “typical” AFFs involving bone turnover suppression due to specific drugs (e.g. bisphosphonates) and fragility fractures of the bowed femoral shaft. In this article, the classification of stress fractures is redefined with the addition of atypical fractures as a fourth category, in which biological activity for fracture healing is absent, to promote consistent understanding and interpretation of clinical conditions involving stress fractures.


Injury ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 739-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.L. Loizou ◽  
I. McNamara ◽  
K. Ahmed ◽  
G.A. Pryor ◽  
M.J. Parker
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
F.S. Haddad ◽  
F. Rayan

♦ Periprosthetic fractures: intraoperative or postoperative femoral or acetabular fractures♦ Third commonest reason for reoperation after THA♦ Vancouver classification Type A, B, and C♦ Three most important factors that determine treatment are:• Site of the fracture• Stability of the implant• Quality of the surrounding bone stock.


Injury ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J.H. Gregory ◽  
D.J. Wood ◽  
J. Stevens

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document