Speech processing cortical representation: invariance in left superior temporal sulcus and variability in Broca's area

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 220
Author(s):  
S. Dollfus ◽  
G. Josse ◽  
M. Joliot ◽  
F. Crivello ◽  
D. Papathanassiou ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 3942-3948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.-S. Lee ◽  
P. Turkeltaub ◽  
R. Granger ◽  
R. D. S. Raizada

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Petersen ◽  
A. Gjedde ◽  
M. Wallentin ◽  
P. Vuust

The most dramatic progress in the restoration of hearing takes place in the first months after cochlear implantation. To map the brain activity underlying this process, we used positron emission tomography at three time points: within 14 days, three months, and six months after switch-on. Fifteen recently implanted adult implant recipients listened to running speech or speech-like noise in four sequential PET sessions at each milestone. CI listeners with postlingual hearing loss showed differential activation of left superior temporal gyrus during speech and speech-like stimuli, unlike CI listeners with prelingual hearing loss. Furthermore, Broca’s area was activated as an effect of time, but only in CI listeners with postlingual hearing loss. The study demonstrates that adaptation to the cochlear implant is highly related to the history of hearing loss. Speech processing in patients whose hearing loss occurred after the acquisition of language involves brain areas associated with speech comprehension, which is not the case for patients whose hearing loss occurred before the acquisition of language. Finally, the findings confirm the key role of Broca’s area in restoration of speech perception, but only in individuals in whom Broca’s area has been active prior to the loss of hearing.


2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Musso ◽  
A Schneider ◽  
C Büchel ◽  
C Weiller
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii212-ii212
Author(s):  
John Andrews ◽  
Nathan Cahn ◽  
Benjamin Speidel ◽  
Valerie Lu ◽  
Mitchel Berger ◽  
...  

Abstract Brodmann’s areas 44/45 of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), are the seat of Broca’s area. The Western Aphasia Battery is a commonly used language battery that diagnoses aphasias based on fluency, comprehension, naming and repetition. Broca’s aphasia is defined as low fluency (0-4/10), retained comprehension (4-10/10), and variable deficits in repetition (0-7.9/10) and naming (0-8/10). The purpose of this study was to find anatomic areas associated with Broca’s aphasia. Patients who underwent resective brain surgery in the dominant hemisphere were evaluated with standardized language batteries pre-op, POD 2, and 1-month post-op. The resection cavities were outlined to construct 3D-volumes of interest. These were aligned using an affine transformation to MNI brain space. A voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) algorithm determined areas associated with Broca’s aphasia when incorporated into a resection. Post-op MRIs were reviewed blindly and percent involvement of pars orbitalis, triangularis and opercularis was recorded. 287 patients had pre-op and POD 2 language evaluations and 178 had 1 month post-op language evaluation. 82/287 patients had IFG involvement in resections. Only 5/82 IFG resections led to Broca’s aphasia. 11/16 patients with Broca’s aphasia at POD 2 had no involvement of IFG in resection. 35% of IFG resections were associated with non-specific dysnomia and 36% were normal. By one-month, 76% of patients had normal speech. 80% of patients with Broca’s aphasia at POD 2 improved to normal speech at 1-month, with 20% improved to non-specific dysnomia. The most highly correlated (P< 0.005) anatomic areas with Broca’s aphasia were juxta-sylvian pre- and post-central gyrus extending to supramarginal gyrus. While Broca’s area resections were rarely associated with Broca’s aphasia, juxta-sylvian pre- and post-central gyri extending to the supramarginal gyrus were statistically associated with Broca’s type aphasia when resected. These results have implications for planning resective brain surgery in these presumed eloquent brain areas.


Neuroreport ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (18) ◽  
pp. 965-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emeline Clerget ◽  
Arnaud Badets ◽  
Julie Duqué ◽  
Etienne Olivier

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 563-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiru Makuuchi
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document