Nonparametric tests of conditional mean-variance efficiency of a benchmark portfolio

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Q. Wang
2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1851-1859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjini Jha ◽  
Bob Korkie ◽  
Harry J. Turtle

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 985-1011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Peñaranda

AbstractI develop two new types of portfolio efficiency when returns are predictable. The first type maximizes the unconditional Sharpe ratio of excess returns and differs from unconditional efficiency unless the safe asset return is constant over time. The second type maximizes conditional mean-variance preferences and differs from unconditional efficiency unless, additionally, the maximum conditional Sharpe ratio is constant. Using stock data, I quantify and test their performance differences with respect to unconditionally and fixed-weight efficient returns. I also show the relevance of the two new portfolio strategies to test conditional asset pricing models.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
I GEDE ERY NISCAHYANA ◽  
KOMANG DHARMAWAN ◽  
I NYOMAN WIDANA

When the returns of stock prices show the existence of autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity, then conditional mean variance models are suitable method to model the behavior of the stocks. In this thesis, the implementation of the conditional mean variance model to the autocorrelated and heteroscedastic return was discussed. The aim of this thesis was to assess the effect of the autocorrelated and heteroscedastic returns to the optimal solution of a portfolio. The margin of four stocks, Fortune Mate Indonesia Tbk (FMII.JK), Bank Permata Tbk (BNLI.JK), Suryamas Dutamakmur Tbk (SMDM.JK) dan Semen Gresik Indonesia Tbk (SMGR.JK) were estimated by GARCH(1,1) model with standard innovations following the standard normal distribution and the t-distribution.  The estimations were used to construct a portfolio. The portfolio optimal was found when the standard innovation used was t-distribution with the standard deviation of 1.4532 and the mean of 0.8023 consisting of 0.9429 (94%) of FMII stock, 0.0473 (5%) of  BNLI stock, 0% of SMDM stock, 1% of  SMGR stock.


1995 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Engel ◽  
Jeffrey A. Frankel ◽  
Kenneth A. Froot ◽  
Anthony P. Rodrigues

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-209
Author(s):  
Su Jin Lee ◽  
Jin Wan Cho ◽  
Jae Hyun Lee

This paper provides the methodology of estimating the risk-return relationship of alternative asset investments within the mean-variance framework. While conducting strategic asset allocation, most of the institutional investors do not take into account the risk-return relationship of alternative assets, or use arbitrary policy numbers that do not properly reflect the characteristics of alternative assets. This paper borrows the concept of reference portfolio in developing the methodology of estimating the risk-return relationship of alternative investments. The reference portfolio is the benchmark portfolio used in strategic asset allocation by pension funds. This can serve as the opportunity costs of alternative investments. We use the realized IRR’s from actual investments, and estimate the risk-return characteristics of alternative investments. We find that by properly estimating the mapping relationship between the reference portfolio and alternative asset classes, we can incorporate the risk-return profile of these non-market assets within the mean-variance framework together with the other traditional asset classes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 1333-1356
Author(s):  
Hanene Ben Salah ◽  
Ali Gannoun ◽  
Mathieu Ribatet

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Khreshna Syuhada ◽  
Risti Nur’aini ◽  
Mahfudhotin

A Value-at-Risk (VaR) forecast may be calculated for the case of a random loss alone and/or of a random loss that depends on another random loss. In both cases, the VaR forecast is obtained by employing its (conditional) probability distribution of loss data, specifically the quantile of loss distribution. In practice, we have an estimative VaR forecast in which the distribution parameter vector is replaced by its estimator. In this paper, the quantile-based estimative VaR forecast for dependent random losses is explored through a simulation approach. It is found that the estimative VaR forecast is more accurate when a copula is employed. Furthermore, the stronger the dependence of a random loss to the target loss, in linear correlation, the larger/smaller the conditional mean/variance. In any dependence measure, generally, stronger and negative dependence gives a higher forecast. When there is a tail dependence, the use of upper and lower tail dependence provides a better forecast instead of the single correlation coefficient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document