Development of a major trauma resuscitation chart

1997 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-7
Author(s):  
M. Bolsin
2005 ◽  
Vol 190 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony M.-H. Ho ◽  
Manoj K. Karmakar ◽  
Peter W. Dion

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (5 Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S140-S140
Author(s):  
V. Coba ◽  
C. Irvin ◽  
R. Steele ◽  
E. Edhayan ◽  
M. K. Mulqueen

2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
RO Sundaram ◽  
RW Parkinson

INTRODUCTION We determined the compliance rates of orthopaedic trauma team members in applying universal precautions in major trauma resuscitation scenarios and the availability of universal precautions in accident and emergency (A&E) departments throughout England. MATERIALS AND METHODS A national telephone survey was implemented contacting the first on-call orthopaedic surgeon and A&E departments in hospital trusts accepting major trauma throughout England. A questionnaire was employed to ascertain current practice, experience and availability of universal precautions when managing a major trauma patient. RESULTS Overall, 112 first on-call orthopaedic surgeons and 99 A&E departments responded. There was good compliance for using gloves (99%) and aprons (86%). There was poor compliance in using eye protectors (21%), face masks (18%), shoe covers (4%) and head caps (4%). Trainees applied universal precautions according to the level of risk they subjectively perceived. All A&E departments had gloves and aprons but the availability of the other universal precautions was less. Of trainees, 76 reported that all universal precautions were not readily available in the A&E department. CONCLUSION Orthopaedic trauma team members are very compliant in using gloves and aprons, but should be more compliant in using eye protectors. It is questionable whether face masks, head caps and shoe covers need to be used in all trauma scenarios. In general, universal precautions should be more available in the A&E departments. There should be better communication between A&E departments and the trauma team regarding the availability of universal precautions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray Quinn ◽  
David Menzies ◽  
Angela Sheridan ◽  
Mark O'Byrne ◽  
Mark O'Neill ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p><p>Pre hospital trauma care is often delivered by dual crewed ambulances supported by additional resources as necessary and available. Coordinating resuscitation of a critically injured patient may require multiple simultaneous actions. Equally, a large number of practitioners can hinder patient care if not coordinated.</p><p><strong>Aims</strong></p><p>To describe a multi disciplinary, scaleabe approach to pre hospital trauma care suitable for small and large multi disciplinary teams. Methods The MCI medical team (as part of Motorsport Rescue Services) is a PHECC-registered multidisciplinary team, which provides medical cover at Motorcycle road racing events in Ireland. The MCI medical team has significant experience of major trauma and routinely performs prehospital anaesthesia for trauma patients. We have evolved a pit crew approach to trauma care with pre defined roles and interventions assigned to a five person team, three clinical members, a scribe and a team lead. The approach is both scalable and collapsible, meaning that if multiple patients are present, roles can be merged; if additional clinical input is required, roles can also be supplemented. Each team member carries equipment and medications specific to their role, allowing efficiencies at the patients side.</p><p><strong>Results</strong></p><p>The pit crew approach to pre hospital trauma care has evolved over a decade and is routinely implemented at motorcycle road races in Ireland.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p><p>The pit crew trauma approach, although applicable to a pre defined five person team in unique circumstances, may also be applicable to ad hoc clinical teams that typically form in the pre hospital arena.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document