Demersal fish assemblages off southern New Zealand in relation to depth and temperature

1998 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 2119-2155 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Jacob ◽  
S. McClatchie ◽  
P.K. Probert ◽  
R.J. Hurst
Author(s):  
Régis Santos ◽  
Wendell Medeiros‐Leal ◽  
Ana Novoa‐Pabon ◽  
Hélder Silva ◽  
Mário Pinho

Author(s):  
Montserrat Demestre ◽  
Pilar Sánchez ◽  
Pere Abelló

Continental shelf and upper slope fish communities were studied along the Catalan coast based on 66 experimental bottom otter trawls. A total of 79 demersal fish species were studied by means of cluster analysis and multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) ordination for community structure. Analysis revealed the existence of five major location clusters. Similarity percentage analysis (SIMPER) was determined by comparing the dissimilarity between two groups of samples using the discriminating species. Geomorphological characteristics, bottom substratum and depth showed direct influences on species assemblages. High correlation between the biotic data samples and depth was observed. The fish species assemblages identified five main demersal fish associations which corresponded with the five location clusters and with five benthic sediments (mud of the upper slope, sand and gravel, mud of the shelf, muddy-sand and sand with rocky outcrops).


2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
ML Camara ◽  
B Mérigot ◽  
F Leprieur ◽  
JA Tomasini ◽  
I Diallo ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhys A. Edwards ◽  
Stephen D. A. Smith

In marine habitats, the use of geotextile materials as a ‘soft-engineering’ solution is increasingly being considered as an alternative to hard structures. However, very little is known about biological assemblages that develop on geotextile structures. This study provides the first ecological comparison of subtidal assemblages between Narrowneck Artificial Reef (NAR), a geotextile reef in south-east Queensland, Australia, and three nearby natural reefs. Benthic community structure, fish assemblages and habitat complexity were compared between reef types using an asymmetrical design. Although natural reefs supported distinct biotic assemblages, as a class, these reefs differed significantly from NAR. The artificial reef was dominated by macroalgae and supported fewer benthic categories, whereas the natural reefs were characterised by a diverse range of sessile invertebrates. Benthic and demersal fish assemblages were less diverse on NAR, but pelagic fish assemblages were similar on both reef types. The substratum of NAR was less complex than that of the natural reefs; this physical variable was correlated with some of the differences in benthic communities and benthic and demersal fish assemblages. It is likely that the key determinants of the biotic patterns observed in this study are interactions between the age of NAR and the physical properties of geotextile substratum.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document