Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Role of Preoperative and Postoperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy

1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Fletcher
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (B) ◽  
pp. 313-317
Author(s):  
Mohamed Abdzaid Akool ◽  
Samer Makki Mohamed Al-Hakkak ◽  
Alaa Abood Al-Wadees

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy considers a golden surgery for gallbladder removal nowadays, and it carries some complications like biliary injuries, which can manage successfully by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. AIM: To estimate the role of endoscopic management of bile duct injury (BDI) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PATIENT AND METHODS: A prospective study conducted at Al-Sader Medical City, Najaf City, Iraq, during the period between September 2018 and December 2020, included 44 patients complicated by the biliary injury resulting in a persistent biliary leak and/or jaundice after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and evaluated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). RESULTS: Findings revealed that 25% of cases had complete BDI, only one managed by plastic stent placement, the other 10 referred for open surgical constructions, 61% had partial injury associated with the biliary leak, all managed by sphincterotomy and plastic stent placement through ERCP, almost 7% had a partial clipping of bile duct all managed with sphincterotomy, balloon dilatation/stone extraction, and plastic stent placement, 5% had slipped clips of cystic duct stump, are managed with sphincterotomy and plastic stent placement. Moreover, only one patient, 2%, had distal common bile duct stone with bile leak, managed by sphincterotomy and stone extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a gold standard therapeutic option for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis, is associated with an increased risk of biliary injury due to many factors. ERCP is a safe means of diagnosing the cause of bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It also offers definitive treatment in most cases by endoscopic sphincterotomy and plastic stent placement.


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prof. Dr./Abd El Ghany Mahmoud El Shamy ◽  
Dr./Ahmed Magdy Ahmed Farrag ◽  
Ahmed Kamal Mohammed Mohammed

Abstract Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) post Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with endoscopic sphincterotomy(ES) is generally accepted as the treatment of choice for patient with choledococystolithiasis. Previous studies have shown that LC after ERCP is associated with a high conversion rate. The aim of the present study was to assess the complexity of LC after ERCP compared with standard LC for symptomatic uncomplicated cholecystolithiasis. Objective s: So the aim of this study is to assess the complexity of LC post ERCP comparted to elective LC without previous ERCP. Method The study is a prospective cohort study of two groups of patients: patients who had undergone a previous ERCP for choledocolithiasis (PES) and patients with cholecystolithiasis who had no previous intervention prior to LC (NPES). Results The PES group consists of 25 patients and the NPES group consists of 25 consecutive patients, patients in the PES group had a higher risks for longer (more than 35 min) duration of operation, the conversion rate in the PES group and the NPES group (12% versus 0%, respectively) were not significantly different, duration of post-operative hospital stay in the PES group was longer than NPES group, there was more difficulty in achieving the critical view of safety in the PES group (easily achieved in 48%) than NPES group(easily achieved in 92%). Conclusion A laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ES is longer and more difficult than in uncomplicated cholelithiasis and should therefore be performed by an experienced surgeon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document