Prognostic value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in patients with left bundle branch block

Abstract Background Previous studies have shown that left bundle branch block (LBBB), as a relatively common electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormality, represents the condition with often non benign and sometimes adverse outcome. Purpose The Aim of our study was to determine the predictive value of a stress echocardiography test in patients with LBBB. Methods Our study population included 189 patients (88 male, 46.6%, mean age 63.08±9.65) with diagnosed left bundle branch block who performed stress echocardiography (SECHO) according to Bruce protocol. Median follow-up of the patients was 56 months (IQR 48–71 months) for the occurrence of cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting-CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention-PCI). Results Out of 189 patients, 32 (16.9%) patients had positive, while 157 (83.1%) patients had negative SECHO test. During the follow up period 28 patients had major adverse cardiac event: 1 nonfatal myocardial infarction, 6 heart failure hospitalizations, 5 CABGs, 8 PCIs, while 8 patients had cardiac death. Using the Cox regression analysis, univariate predictors of adverse cardiac events were diabetes mellitus (HR 4.530 [95% CI 1.355–15.141], p=0.014), PCI (HR 4.288 [95% [95% CI 2.010–9.144], p<0.001) and positive SECHO test (HR 2.289 [95% CI 1.006–5207], p=0.048). In the multivariate analysis only previous PCI remained independent predictor of adverse events (HR 3.650 [95% CI 1.665–8.003], p=0.001). p=0.048). Using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve the patients with negative SECHO had better outcome compared to patients with positive SECHO (140/160; 87,5% vs 21/29; 72.4%, p=0.035) and much longer event-free time (77.4±1.6 months vs 67.1±5.4 months, Log Rank 4.136, p=0.042) Conclusion Patients with LBBB and negative SEHO test have good prognosis. Patients with history of CAD and diabetes mellitus and LBBB are at increased risk for future events and need periodical reassessment. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Download Full-text

P1788 Prognostic value of stress echocardiography in preoperative risk stratification and management

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging ◽

10.1093/ehjci/jez319.1144 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

I Almeida ◽

R Pereira ◽

I Cruz ◽

M Quadrado ◽

A R Almeida ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Myocardial Infarction ◽

Risk Stratification ◽

Prognostic Value ◽

Stress Echocardiography ◽

Perioperative Complications ◽

Pharmacologic Stress ◽

Cardiac Complications ◽

Pharmacological Stress ◽

Preoperative Risk ◽

Preoperative Risk Stratification

Abstract Introduction The prognostic value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography has been extensively demonstrated in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery since 42% of the perioperative complications are cardiac. Coronary artery stenoses can became flow-limiting due to hemodynamic fluctuations in this period leading to myocardial ischemia. Purpose Evaluation of prognostic value of pharmacologic stress echocardiography in preoperative risk stratification. Methods Single center retrospective analysis of patients’ data referred to perform a preoperative risk stratification through pharmacological stress echocardiography between January 2014- December 2018. Data was collected regarding clinical and echocardiographic parameters to predict perioperative cardiac complications (myocardial infarction and development of arrythmias) and evaluate the impact of the result of DSE in patients´ clinical management. Results Of 910 pharmacological stress echocardiograms, 106 were performed to evaluate preoperative risk. Patients´ mean age was 66 ± 11 years, 85% males. 64% had hypertension, 45% dyslipidaemia, 38% current smokers and 18% diabetes. 189% had previously myocardial infarction and 9% stroke. All patients were proposed to intermediate-high risk surgeries: 73% to vascular surgery, 14% to kidney transplant and 13% to other type of surgery (especially abdominal surgery). Most of the stress tests (64%) were performed with dobutamine and the others 34% with dipyridamole. 91% of stress echocardiography were negative, 6% positive and 4% inconclusive. The patients with a positive stress test was submitted to coronary angiography to treat relevant lesions and cardiovascular risk factors were optimized. 72% of the patients has already been submitted to the proposed surgery; in this population, there was a 5% rate of cardiac complications following the surgery, all in patients with previous negative stress echocardiography. Complications were non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in 1% and de novo atrial fibrillation in 4%. Half of the patients with a positive stress echocardiography were operated with no cardiac perioperative complications, possibly related to patient´s optimization before the surgery; in the other half it was decided not to perform the surgery due to the potential cardiac risk. Predictor factors for perioperative cardiac complications, evaluated through univariate and multivariate analysis, were age (odds ratios (OR) 1.232, confidence interval (CI) 1.043-1.456, p 0.007) and stroke (OR 0.057, CI 0.947-44.592, p 0.033). Conclusion In our study, patients with a positive stress echocardiography were optimized before the surgery leading to none cardiac perioperative complications, emphasizing the importance of this test in preoperative patients´ management.

Download Full-text