Trial finds intensive lipid-lowering reduces coronary atherosclerosis progression more than moderate regimenAbstracted from: Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, et al. Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291(9): 1071-80.

2004 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-271
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Coronary Atherosclerosis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Atherosclerosis Progression ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Lowering Therapy

scholarly journals Lipid Lowering Therapy with Combination of Niacin and Statin in Women: Age-Related Endothelial Effects

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Beth Parker ◽  
Kamlesh Kothawade ◽  
Namee Kim ◽  
Maura Paul-Labrador ◽  
Noel Bairey Merz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Function ◽  
Vascular Function ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Age Related

Background. Many women remain at risk for cardiac events despite treatment to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We hypothesized that for postmenopausal women treated with niacin in addition to statin vascular function will improve. Methods. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 16 weeks of niacin (N) versus placebo (PL) in 43 women (mean age, 67±9 years) previously on statin therapy. Study outcomes included lipoprotein levels, vascular inflammation assessed by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and endothelial function, assessed as brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD). Results. The N group significantly increased HDL-C and decreased LDL-C cholesterol relative to PL (both P<0.01). FMD improved in both groups (P=0.02) irrespective of niacin (P=0.21). Age influenced change in FMD (P=0.01) such that improved FMD (before to after) with lipid lowering therapy was greater with older age (P=0.03 Pearson correlation = 0.34), independent of treatment group. Conclusions. Lipid lowering therapy with combination of niacin and statin does not improve inflammation or endothelial function compared to statin alone. However, older women demonstrate relatively greater endothelial benefit of lipid lowering therapy over 4 months. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00590629.

Abstract 13787: Efficacy of Lowering Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Elderly Subjects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Baris Gencer ◽  
Nicholas A Marston ◽  
KyungAh Im ◽  
Peter S Sever ◽  
Anthony C Keech ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Lowering Therapy ◽  
Myocardial Infraction

Introduction: The clinical benefit from LDL-C lowering therapy in the elderly remains debated. Aim: To synthesize the efficacy of lowering LDL-C in patients aged ≥75 years in the light of most recently published data. Methods: Medline database was searched for the most recent evidence (2015-2020). The key inclusion criterion was a randomized controlled cardiovascular outcome trial testing an LDL-C lowering therapy with data available in patients aged ≥75 years at randomization. For efficacy, we meta-analyzed the risk ratio (RR) of major vascular events (a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction, stroke or coronary revascularization) per 1-mmol/L reduction in LDL-C. Results: Among 244,090 patients from 29 trials, 21,492 (8.8%) were elderly; 11,750 from statin trials, 6209 from ezetimibe trials, and 3533 from PCSK9 inhibitor trials. Median follow-up ranged from 2.2-6.0 years. LDL-C lowering therapy significantly reduced major vascular events (n=3519) in the elderly by 26% per 1-mmol/L LDL-C reduction (RR 0.74 [0.61-0.89], P=0.002), which was at least as good as the magnitude of effect seen in the non-elderly patients (RR 0.85 [0.78-0.92]; P interaction =0.24). Amongst the elderly, the RR was similar for statin (0.81 [0.70-0.94]) and non-statin therapy (0.67 [0.47-0.95]; P interaction =0.60). The benefit of LDL-C lowering in the elderly was observed for each component of the composite, including CV death (RR 0.85 [0.73-0.996], P=0.045), myocardial infraction (RR 0.80 [0.70-0.92], P=0.001), stroke (RR 0.71 [0.58-0.87], P=0.001) and coronary revascularization (RR 0.78 [0.63-0.96], P=0.017). Conclusion: In patients 75 years and older, lipid-lowering therapy is as effective in reducing CV events as it is in younger adults. These results should strengthen guideline recommendations for the use of lipid-lowering therapies, including non-statin therapy, in the elderly.

scholarly journals Reinforcing Adherence to Lipid-lowering Therapy after an Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanos Zafeiropoulos ◽  
Ioannis Farmakis ◽  
Anastasios Kartas ◽  
Alexandra Arvanitaki ◽  
Konstantinos Arvanitakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Goal Attainment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Lipid Lowering Therapy ◽  
Good Adherence ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
One Year

Abstract Aims: Achieving the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a milestone often missed due to suboptimal adherence to secondary prevention treatments. Whether improved adherence could result in reduced LDL-C levels is unclear. We aimed to evaluate an educational-motivational intervention to increase long-term lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) adherence and LDL-C goal attainment rate among post-ACS patients.Methods: IDEAL-LDL was a parallel, two-arm, single-center, pragmatic, investigator-initiated randomized controlled trial. Hospitalized patients for ACS were randomized to a physician-led integrated intervention consisting of an educational session at baseline, followed by regular motivational interviewing phone sessions or usual care. Co-primary outcomes were the LLT adherence (measured by Proportion of Days Covered (PDC); good adherence defined as PDC>80%), and LDL-C goal (<70 mg/dl or 50% reduction from baseline) achievement rate at one year.Results: In total, 360 patients (mean age 62 years, 81% male) were randomized. Overall, good adherence was positively associated with LDL-C goal achievement rate at one year. Median PDC was higher in the intervention group than the control group [0.92 (IQR, 0.82–1.00) vs. 0.86 (0.62–0.98); p=0.03] while the intervention group had increased odds of good adherence (adjusted odds ratio: 1.76 (95% confidence interval 1.02 to 2.62; p=0.04). However, neither the rate of LDL-C goal achievement (49.6% in the intervention vs. 44.9% in the control group; p=0.49) nor clinical outcomes differed significantly between the two groups.Conclusion: Α multifaceted intervention improved LLT adherence in post-ACS patients without a significant difference in LDL-C goal attainment. (IDEAL-LDL, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02927808)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document