Data analysis and Structural Analysis Methods Applied to an Industrial Process: Comparative Study

1981 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 2529-2536
Author(s):  
P. Prévot ◽  
J. Dufour ◽  
G. Vitry
2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirosław Kwiatkowski ◽  
Dimitrios Kalderis

Abstract This paper presents the results of the analysis of the porous structure of biochars produced from biomass, namely eucalyptus, wood chips, pruning waste and rice husk. The structural analysis was carried out using the BET, the t-plot, the NLDFT and the LBET methods, which yielded not only complementary information on the adsorptive properties of obtained biochars from these materials, but also information on the usefulness of the structural analysis methods in question for the research into an effect of the technology of carbonaceous adsorbent preparation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (33) ◽  
pp. 4783-4789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Mabbott ◽  
Yun Xu ◽  
Royston Goodacre

Reproducibility of SERS signal acquired from thin films developed in-house and commercially has been assessed using seven data analysis methods.


2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. e22-e23
Author(s):  
Karen A. Monsen ◽  
Karen S. Martin ◽  
Bonnie L Westra

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip E. Higuera ◽  
Daniel G. Gavin ◽  
Patrick J. Bartlein ◽  
Douglas J. Hallett

Over the past several decades, high-resolution sediment–charcoal records have been increasingly used to reconstruct local fire history. Data analysis methods usually involve a decomposition that detrends a charcoal series and then applies a threshold value to isolate individual peaks, which are interpreted as fire episodes. Despite the proliferation of these studies, methods have evolved largely in the absence of a thorough statistical framework. We describe eight alternative decomposition models (four detrending methods used with two threshold-determination methods) and evaluate their sensitivity to a set of known parameters integrated into simulated charcoal records. Results indicate that the combination of a globally defined threshold with specific detrending methods can produce strongly biased results, depending on whether or not variance in a charcoal record is stationary through time. These biases are largely eliminated by using a locally defined threshold, which adapts to changes in variability throughout a charcoal record. Applying the alternative decomposition methods on three previously published charcoal records largely supports our conclusions from simulated records. We also present a minimum-count test for empirical records, which reduces the likelihood of false positives when charcoal counts are low. We conclude by discussing how to evaluate when peak detection methods are warranted with a given sediment–charcoal record.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document