Abnormal lung features on prenatal ultrasound and postnatal outcome

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. S95-S96
Author(s):  
A.E. Dereymaeker ◽  
A. Debeer ◽  
L. De Catte ◽  
R. Devlieger ◽  
L. Breysem ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. S209-S210
Author(s):  
V. Ravishankar ◽  
R.A. Ehrenkranz ◽  
J.A. Copel ◽  
U. Magriples

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (03) ◽  
pp. 333-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte Strizek ◽  
Aikaterini Zamprakou ◽  
Ingo Gottschalk ◽  
Maria Roethlisberger ◽  
Astrid Hellmund ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To assess the anatomic variants, associated anomalies and postnatal outcome of fetuses with a prenatally diagnosed agenesis of ductus venosus (ADV). Materials and Methods Retrospective study of 119 cases with agenesis of ductus venosus diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound in two tertiary referral centers from 2006 to 2014. The type and location of the umbilical venous drainage site was noted. Charts were reviewed for associated structural or chromosomal anomalies, pregnancy outcome and postnatal course. Results In 24 cases (20.2 %) ADV was an isolated finding, while 95 cases (79.8 %) had associated anomalies. We identified 84 cases (70.6 %) with intrahepatic and 35 cases (29.4 %) with extrahepatic drainage of the umbilical vein. 58.8 % of neonates were alive at follow-up. There was no statistical association between drainage site and associated anomalies or outcome. Postnatal outcome was determined by the presence and severity of associated anomalies. There was no adverse outcome in the isolated group related to ADV. Overall, there were 6 persistent portosystemic shunts, 3 of them with a spontaneous closure, and one total agenesis of the portal venous system with lethal outcome. Conclusion Postnatal outcome in cases with ADV mainly depends on the presence of associated anomalies. In isolated cases the prognosis is generally good, but neonates with a prenatally diagnosed portosystemic shunt should be followed until its occlusion. Portal venous system agenesis is rare but should be ruled out on prenatal ultrasound.


2000 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 60-60
Author(s):  
C. F. A. Peralta ◽  
V. Bunduki ◽  
J. P. Plese ◽  
R. M. Yamamoto ◽  
S. Miyadahira ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Kwang Shyu ◽  
Jin-Chung Shih ◽  
Chien-Nan Lee ◽  
Hsiao-Lin Hwa ◽  
Song-Nan Chow ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (03) ◽  
pp. 278-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Antonia Kiener ◽  
Christoph Wohlmuth ◽  
Christa Schimke ◽  
Martha Georgina Brandtner ◽  
Dagmar Wertaschnigg

Abstract Purpose Parents confronted with the finding of antenatal hydronephrosis (ANH) are particularly interested in whether their baby will need postnatal surgery. The objective of this study was to predict ANH requiring surgery on the basis of the fetal anteroposterior renal pelvic diameter (APRPD) and the Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) grading system. Materials and Methods The medical records of 179 patients with the finding of ANH were reviewed retrospectively. ANH was graded according to the SFU grading system. Prenatal ultrasound examinations were correlated to postnatal outcome, which was divided into three groups: prenatal resolution, conservative management and surgical treatment. Results 58 (32.4 %) cases were classified as prenatal resolution, 89 (49.7 %) babies were assigned to the conservative outcome group and 32 (17.9 %) patients needed surgical repair. Postnatal surgery was best predicted in the second trimester (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve: 0.839) by an APRPD cut-off of 8.3 mm (sensitivity: 77.8 %; specificity: 85.7 %; PPV of 53.9 %, NPV of 94.7 %). The combination of the parameters “progression of SFU grade” and SFU grade 3 or 4 achieved a sensitivity of 84.4 % and a specificity of 80.3 % for the prediction of surgery. Conclusion Second-trimester APRPD is a useful parameter for predicting the risk for postnatal surgery. The SFU grade should be assessed in every prenatal ultrasound examination as some further risk estimates can be made based on its dynamics over time.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Seth A. Capello ◽  
Barry A. Kogan ◽  
Louis J. Giorgi ◽  
Ronald P. Kaufman
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document