9:37 Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with anterior lumbar interbody fusion Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium CD-Horizon

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Cody Bünger ◽  
Bjarke Christensen ◽  
Ebbe Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Fusion ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Posterolateral Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

scholarly journals Spine Treatment Appraisal Report (STAR): Does Marijuana Use Affect Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Receiving Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)?

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822199740
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Dettori
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Fusion ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Marijuana Use ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Jakoi AM, Kirchner GJ, Kerbel YE, Iorio JA, Khalsa AS. The effects of marijuana use on lumbar spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(9):629-634.

scholarly journals New combination of IntraSPINE device and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for rare skipped-level lumbar disc herniation: a case report and literature review

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 030006052094976
Author(s):  
Shitong Feng ◽  
Zihan Fan ◽  
Jiashuai Ni ◽  
Yong Yang ◽  
Qi Fei
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Fusion ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Disease ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion is an open surgical technique that has been widely used for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. However, traditional lumbar spinal fusion, especially long-segment fusion surgery, is associated with several complications. The IntraSPINE (Cousin Biotech, Wervicq-Sud, France) is a new device for non-fusion lumbar spine surgery that is used as an alternative for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Although the designer of the IntraSPINE proposed indications for its use, including combination of the device with lumbar spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease, use of the IntraSPINE has not been reported in the clinical literature. In the present case, we boldly combined the IntraSPINE device and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of skipped-level lumbar disc herniation to explore the indications of the IntraSPINE and report its clinical outcomes.

Lymphocele formation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4–5

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 566-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Hun Pee ◽  
Ki Joon Kim ◽  
Young-Geun Choi ◽  
Sang Hyeop Jeon ◽  
Jong Dae Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Lower Lumbar

✓ In this report, the authors present the case of patient with a lymphocele in the retroperitoneal area following anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4–5. A lymphocele is a rare complication of spinal operations, especially lower lumbar spinal surgeries. The authors discuss this complicating factor and describe its features and treatments.

Tapered cages in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: biomechanics of segmental reactions

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Moore ◽  
Narayan Yoganandan ◽  
Frank A. Pintar ◽  
Jason Lifshutz ◽  
Dennis J. Maiman
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Related Data ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Bending Modes ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Object The aim of this study was to determine the in vitro biomechanical responses of lumbar spinal segments after implantation of tapered cages. Methods Range of motion (ROM)– and stiffness-related data were determined in 10 human cadaveric T12–S1 columns subjected to flexion, extension, and lateral bending modes before and after anterior lumbar interbody fusion in which stand-alone LT-CAGE devices were used. The overall column showed no significant changes in ROM or stiffness. At the instrumented level, stiffness increased significantly (p < 0.05) in flexion and lateral bending modes. Indications of instability in extension were present, but these values were not statistically significant. There was no evidence of adjacent-level instability at any level in any mode, except for the segment superior to the fixation level in flexion; here there was a significant increase in ROM (p < 0.05) and a decrease in stiffness. Conclusions The anatomical conformity and bilateral placement of cages provide ample stability and rigidity at the treated level, comparable to that of other cage systems. Because hypermobility is traditionally related to early degenerative changes, the present results appear to suggest that cages do not significantly contribute to such alterations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document