C96 THE ROLE OF ADDITIONAL TREATMENTS IN LYMPH NODE POSITIVE UROTHELIAL BLADDER CANCER

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 636
Author(s):  
C. Kara ◽  
U. Balci ◽  
K. Ozer ◽  
S. Ozbir ◽  
C. Girgin ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 959-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berkan Reşorlu ◽  
Kadir Türkölmez ◽  
Gül Ergün ◽  
Sümer Baltacı ◽  
Çağatay Göğüş ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14510-14510
Author(s):  
I. Cordia ◽  
C. H. Ohlmann ◽  
U. Engelmann ◽  
A. Heidenreich

14510 Background: A recent meta-analysis has demonstrated a 25% relative risk reduction of death and an absolute survival benefit of 9% at 3 years for adjuvant chemotherapy following radical cystectomy (RCx) for lymph node positive bladder cancer. It was the aim of our analysis to identify predictors of survival following standard chemotherapy in lymph node positive bladder cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 156 consecutive patients with lymph node positive urothelial bladder cancer was performed. All patients underwent systemic chemotherapy with 4 cycles gemictabine/cisplatin 4 to 6 weeks after RCx. The prognostic significance of the number of positive lymph nodes, lymph node diameter, extranodal extension, bilateral lymph node involvement, pT stage, grade, tumor diameter, presence of lymphatic (LI) or vascular invasion (VI) was analysed. Statistical analysis was performed by uni- and multivariate analysis. Results: Median follow-up is 6.5 (12 – 3.5) years, minimum follow-up is 36 months. Median survival time is 56 months, 56% of the patients died due to tumor progression. pT stage (p = 0.002), tumor diameter (p = 0.005), LI (p = 0.0015) or VI (p = 0.0028), lymph node diameter (p = 0.026) and extranodal extension (p = 0.0002) were significant risk factors associated with survival by univariate analysis. Neither the number or bilaterality of positive lymph nodes nor tumor grade were associated with survival time. On multivariate analysis only extranodal extension (p = 0.001) and tumor diameter (p = 0.05) remained significant and independent prognostic predictors. Median survival was 64 and 21 months in patients with or w/o extranodal extension (p = 0.0001), resp.; median survival was 81 and 28 months in patients w/o and with LI/VI (p = 0.001). In patients with extranodal extension or LI/VI adjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on survival. Conclusions: Analysis of multiple pathohistological and clinical parameters reveal that extranodal extension, primary tumor diameter and presence of LI/VI represent risk factors predicting survival following adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node positive bladder cancer. Patients exhibiting these adverse factors might be considered for a more aggressive systemic approach. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 975-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruili Luo ◽  
Sharon H. Giordano ◽  
Dong D. Zhang ◽  
Jean Freeman ◽  
James S. Goodwin

Author(s):  
Fabio Calabrò ◽  
Cora N. Sternberg

Although bladder cancer is considered a chemosensitive malignancy, the prognosis of patients with metastatic disease is poor, with a median survival of approximately 12–14 months in good prognosis patients and with cure in only a minority. The addition of new drugs to the standard cisplatin-based regimens has not improved these outcomes. In this chapter, we highlight the role of chemotherapy and the impact of the new targeted agents in the treatment of metastatic bladder carcinoma. A better understanding of the underlying biology and the molecular patterns of urothelial bladder cancer has led to clinical investigation of several therapeutic targets. To date, these agents have yet to demonstrate an improvement in overall survival. Urothelial cancer is extremely sensitive to checkpoint inhibition with both anti PD-1 and anti PDL1 antibodies. The future seems brighter with the advent of these new therapies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenio Ventimiglia ◽  
Thomas Seisen ◽  
Firas Abdollah ◽  
Alberto Briganti ◽  
Valerie Fonteyne ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document