93 Change of differential renal function after laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with short warm ischemic time

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. e93-e93a
Author(s):  
K.S. Kim ◽  
S.W. Choi ◽  
Y.S. Choi ◽  
W.J. Bae ◽  
H.J. Cho ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 282-283
Author(s):  
Shigeta Masanobu ◽  
Koji Mita ◽  
Tsuguru Usui ◽  
Kazushi Marukawa ◽  
Toshihiro Tachikake

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 344-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest Chan ◽  
Shawna L. Boyle ◽  
Jeffrey Campbell ◽  
Patrick P.W. Luke

Introduction: The relative impact of preoperative and perioperative variables on renal function following partial nephrectomy (PN) is controversial. To further investigate, we assess the effects of tumour complexity, warm ischemic time (WIT), and volume of resected renal parenchyma on ipsilateral renal function (IRF) outcomes following minimally invasive PN.Methods: Of patients who underwent laparoscopic or roboticassisted PN between 2002 and 2011 at our institution, 99 met our inclusion criteria. The effects of preoperative tumour complexity (using RENAL nephrometry score), perioperative WIT, and pathological tumour volumes on ipsilateral renal function preservation (%IRF) were analyzed. %IRF was defined as the proportion of postoperative to preoperative ipsilateral renal function calculated using MAG3 nuclear renography.Results: Increasing RENAL nephrometry score (RNS) and WIT were independently predictive of inferior %IRF at 6‒12-week postoperative followup in univariate and multivariate analyses. Of RNS properties, masses that were endophytic, near the collecting system, or central in location were associated with inferior %IRF, with nearness to collecting system as the strongest predictor; however, RNS was no longer predictive of %IRF in cases requiring more than 30 minutes of WIT.Conclusions: In renal masses amenable to resection by minimally invasive PN, longer WIT was the most important predictor of inferior %IRF. Although increasing RNS score influenced %IRF, the overall clinical significance of RNS is limited and should not influence operative decision-making in efforts to preserve renal function. Furthermore, small volumes of renal parenchyma can be safely resected without impairment of long-term IRF.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 161-166
Author(s):  
Krishnendu Biswas ◽  
Rohan S Batra ◽  
Abhishek G Singh ◽  
Arvind P Ganpule ◽  
Ravindra B Sabnis ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the effect of warm ischemic time (WIT) on future renal function (RF) after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) and secondarily, also to find out predictors of future RF after RPN. Method and materials: All patients who underwent RPN with normal pre-operative RF and normal contralateral kidney were included in the study except for those in whom one-year follow up was not completed. Patients were divided in four groups based on WIT (zero, <20minutes, 20 minutes to 30 minutes and >30 minutes). Comparison of demographic and perioperative parameters including follow-up up to one year were done. Univariable and multivariable analysis were done to detect significant correlation of RF with those parameters. Results: Total 198 RPN patients were included in the study. The four groups had comparable demographic data (age, gender, comorbidity, smoking, body mass index, pre-operative RF). Progressively increased WIT was significantly associated with increased tumour size (p=0.022), RENAL nephrometry score (p=0.003), operative time (p=0.004) and blood loss (p=0.046). Post-operatively, RF on first post-operative day (p=0.627), at one month (p=0.581) and at one year (p=0.378) had no significant difference between the four groups. Nine (4.5%) patients progressed to chronic renal disease. Pre-operative RF and perioperative complications only had significant correlation with one-year RF. Conclusion: Tumour size and RENAL nephrometry score significantly influenced WIT. Pre-operative RF and peri-operative complications were the only significant predictors of future RF and not the WIT.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Kubota ◽  
Toshinari Yamasaki ◽  
Shiori Murata ◽  
Yohei Abe ◽  
Yoichiro Tohi ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To assess surgical and functional outcomes in comparison of cortical renorrhaphy omitting, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (CRO-RAPN), and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (CRO-LPN). Methods Between July 2012 and June 2020, patients with localized clinical T1-2 renal masses who underwent CRO-RAPN or CRO-LPN were reviewed. The outcomes of the CRO-RAPN and CRO-LPN groups were compared using propensity score matching. Trifecta was defined as negative surgical margin, less than 25 minutes of warm ischemic time, and no complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or more until three months postoperatively. Preservation rate of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was evaluated at six months postoperatively. Results A total of 291 patients, including 210 patients who underwent CRO-RAPN and 81 patients who underwent CRO-LPN, were included, and matched pairs of 150 patients were analyzed. The CRO-RAPN group was associated with a significantly shorter warm ischemic time (13 min vs 20 min, P < 0.001), shorter total operation time (162 min vs 212 min, P < 0.001), less estimated blood loss (40 mL vs 119 mL, P = 0.002), lower incidence of overall complications (3% vs 16%, P = 0.001), higher preservation rate of eGFR at six months postoperatively (93% vs 89%, P = 0.003), and higher trifecta achievement rate (84% vs 64%, P = 0.004) than the CRO-LPN group. Conclusions CRO-RAPN contributes to a shorter warm ischemic time, less blood loss, fewer complications, and preservation of renal function and makes it feasible to achieve a higher rate of trifecta compared to CRO-LPN.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazushi Tanaka ◽  
Junya Furukawa ◽  
Katsumi Shigemura ◽  
Nobuyuki Hinata ◽  
Takeshi Ishimura ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Woo Lee ◽  
Sung Yong Cho ◽  
Chanhoo Jeon ◽  
Kyungtae Ko ◽  
Hyeon Hoe Kim

Introduction: We evaluated the the association between PADUA scores and postoperative renal function (after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy [RAPN]) and between PADUA scores and warm ischemic time (during RAPN).Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of 106 patients who underwent RAPN for a single localized renal tumour between April 2009 and June 2012. Postoperative renal function was evaluated using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in 85 patients who were followed for at least 6 months. PADUA scores for renal tumours were calculated using contrast-enhanced computed tomography images, if needed, along with magnetic resonance images in some cases.Results: A PADUA score ≥10 and WIT ≥30 minutes were observed in 18 (17.0%) and 51 (48.1%) cases, respectively. PADUA scores were significantly correlated with WIT (p = 0.019) and percent change in eGFR at 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.005). PADUA score (continuous variable, odds ratio [OR] 1.694, p = 0.007) and the high-risk group (PADUA score ≥10) (OR 5.429; p = 0.020) were significantly associated with a WIT of ≥30 minutes by multivariate analysis. A 1-point increase in the PADUA score was associated with an eGFR decrease of >20% at 6 months after RAPN (OR 1.799; p = 0.076). In addition, a PADUA score ≥10, or high risk, (OR 13.965; p = 0.003) was an independent predictor of an eGFR decrease of >20% at 6 months after RAPN.Conclusions: The PADUA classification can reliably predict WIT and postoperative renal functional outcome after RAPN. Furthermore, the study suggests that anatomical aspects of renal tumours are associated with functional outcome after RAPN.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Dong Yu ◽  
Ngoc Ha Nguyen ◽  
Ho Young Ryu ◽  
Sung Kyu Hong ◽  
Seok‐Soo Byun ◽  
...  

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Raghavan ◽  
Mathisekaran Thangarasu ◽  
Sanjay Prakash J ◽  
Rajesh Paul ◽  
Nivash Selvaraj

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 586-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Miyake ◽  
Junya Furukawa ◽  
Nobuyuki Hinata ◽  
Mototsugu Muramaki ◽  
Kazushi Tanaka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document