Posterior reconstruction of pubourethralis on early return of continence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. e2255-e2256
Author(s):  
R. Taneja ◽  
R.A. Malik ◽  
D.K. Chugh
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Posterior Reconstruction

Effect of a novel technique of posterior reconstruction of pubourethralis on ‘early’ return of continence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): A comparative study

2021 ◽  
pp. 039156032110070
Author(s):  
Malik Abdul Rouf ◽  
Venkatesh Kumar ◽  
Anshuman Agarwal ◽  
Mahender Sharma ◽  
Suresh Kumar Rawat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Novel Technique ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Vesicourethral Anastomosis ◽  
Posterior Reconstruction ◽  
And Control

Objective: To study the effect of a novel technique of posterior reconstruction of pubourethralis on early return of continence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Materials and methods: The study included 206 patients of organ confined prostate cancer managed at our centre between March 2014 and December 2018.The patients were randomly distributed into two comparable groups with respect to age, height, weight and BMI, with 100 patients in control and 106 patients in study group. After standard excision of the specimen, the posterior reconstruction in the form of Rocco stitch was done in control group while in addition to Rocco stitch pubourethralis was approximated posteriorly in midline at the proposed site of vesicourethral anastomosis in study group. Continence was defined as the need to use 0–1 pad in 24 h. The data was collected on day 0, 3, 7, 15, 30, 90 and 180 after removal of catheter. Results: At day zero, 3,7, 15, 30, 90 and 180 days after catheter removal continence rates (⩽1 pad usage per day) were observed to be 18.8% versus 0%, 22.6% versus 0%, 50.9% versus 5%, 72.6% versus 20%, 84.9 versus 32%, 97.1% versus 83%, and 97.1% versus 91% in the study and control group respectively. Conclusion: Despite small number of patients in this study the results with respect to early return of continence are encouraging in the reconstruction group and there by in favour of this technique .Furthermore the technique is easily reproducible and may be seen as one more additional step to be applied in order to enhance the recovery of continence after RARP. However it is necessary to further validate the efficacy of this procedure through multicenteric controlled trials.

Anterior and Posterior Reconstruction Technique and Its Impact on Early Return of Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Atug ◽  
Ali Riza Kural ◽  
Ilter Tufek ◽  
Sudesh Srivastav ◽  
Haluk Akpinar
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Posterior Reconstruction

scholarly journals CURRENT TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES FOR EARLY RETURN OF URINARY CONTINENCE FOLLOWING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
TOMOHIKO YANAGIDA ◽  
TOMOYUKI KOGUCHI ◽  
JUNYA HATA ◽  
MICHIHIRO YABE ◽  
YUICHI SATO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Urinary Continence ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Early Return

Bladder Neck Sling Suspension During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy to Improve Early Return of Urinary Continence: A Comparative Analysis

Urology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 632-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Kojima ◽  
Takashi Hamakawa ◽  
Yasue Kubota ◽  
Soichiro Ogawa ◽  
Nobuhiro Haga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Bladder Neck ◽  
Urinary Continence ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Early Return
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document