Equipment design for maintenance: Part I – Guidelines for the practitioner * *The recommendations provided in this guide are based on numerous published and unpublished scientific studies and are intended to enhance worker safety and productivity. These recommendations are neither intended to replace existing standards, if any, nor should be treated as standards. Furthermore, this document should not be construed to represent institutional policy.The following individuals participated in the discussion of the earlier version of this guide. Their suggestions (written or verbal) were incorporated by the authors in this version: Roland Andersson, Sweden; Alvah Bittner, USA; Peter Buckle, UK; Jan Dul, The Netherlands; Bahador Ghahramani, USA; Juhani Ilmarinen, Finland; Asa Kilbom, Sweden; Stephan Konz, USA; Shrawan Kumar, Canada; Tom Leamon, USA; Mark Lehto, USA; William Marras, USA; Barbara McPhee, Australia; James Miller, USA; Anil Mital, USA; Don Morelli, USA; Maurice Oxenburgh, Australia; Jerry Purswell, USA; Jorma Saari, Finland; W. (Tom) Singleton, UK; Juhani Smolander, Finland; Terry Stobbe, USA; Rolf Westgaard, Norway, Jørgen Winkel, Sweden. The guide was also reviewed in depth by several anonymous reviewers.

2000 ◽  
pp. 233-239
Author(s):  
Sheik N. Imrhan
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Equipment Design ◽  
Worker Safety

scholarly journals Machine Safety: Risk Assessment, Risk Reduction

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Ladd
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Equipment Design ◽  
Worker Safety ◽  
End User ◽  
Safety Risk ◽  
Safety Standards ◽  
The Us ◽  
Machine Safety

Worker safety is an issue of major concern worldwide. Evidence to this fact is noted with recent efforts to harmonize US machine safety standards with that of the European Machinery Directive. Changes to the US standards have a dramatic affect on new equipment design. Additionally, older machinery that is still in use must now be upgraded to meet these new requirements. In other words, the end user must now follow the same standards as new equipment manufacturers. Paper published with permission.

Job design for the aged with regard to decline in their maximal aerobic capacity: Part I – Guidelines for the practitioner * *The recommendations provided in this guide are based on numerous published and unpublished scientific studies and are intended to enhance worker safety and productivity. These recommendations are neither intended to replace existing standards, if any, nor should be treated as standards. Furthermore, this document should not be construed to represent institutional policy.The following individuals participated in the discussion of the earlier version of this guide. Their suggestions (written or verbal) were incorporated by the authors in this version: Roland Andersson, Sweden; Alvah Bittner, USA; Peter Buckle, UK; Jan Dul, The Netherlands; Bahador Ghahramani, USA; Sheik Imrhan, USA; Asa Kilbom, Sweden; Stephan Konz, USA; Shrawan Kumar, Canada; Tom Leamon, USA; Mark Lehto, USA; William Marras, USA; Barbara McPhee, Australia; James Miller, USA; Anil Mital, USA; Don Morelli, USA; Maurice Oxenburgh, Australia; Jerry Purswell, USA; Jorma Saari, Finland; W. (Tom) Singleton, UK; Juhani Smolander, Finland; Terry Stobbe, USA; Rolf Westgaard, Norway; Jørgen Winkel, Sweden. The guide was also reviewed in depth by several anonymous reviewers.

2000 ◽  
pp. 189-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juhani Ilmarinen
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Aerobic Capacity ◽  
Job Design ◽  
Worker Safety ◽  
Maximal Aerobic Capacity

Occupational and individual risk factors for shoulder-neck complaints: Part I – Guidelines for the practitioner1 1The recommendations provided in this guide are based on numerous published and unpublished scientific studies and are intended to enhance worker safety and productivity. These recommendations are neither intended to replace existing standards, if any, nor should be treated as standards. Furthermore, this document should not be construed to represent institutional policy.The following individuals participated in the discussion of the earlier version of this guide. Their suggestions (written or verbal) were incorporated by the authors in this version: Roland Andersson, Sweden; Alvah Bittner, USA; Peter Buckle, UK; Jan Dul, The Netherlands; Bahador Ghahramani, USA; Juhani Ilmarinen, Finland; Sheik Imrhan, USA; Asa Kilbom, Sweden; Stephan Konz, USA; Shrawan Kumar, Canada; Tom Leamon, USA; Mark Lehto, USA; William Marras, USA; Barbara McPhee, Australia; James Miller, USA; Anil Mital, USA; Don Morelli, USA; Maurice Oxenburgh, Australia; Jerry Purswell, USA; Jorma Saari, Finland; W. (Tom) Singleton, UK; Juhani Smolander, Finland; Terry Stobbe, USA. The guide was also reviewed in depth by several anonymous reviewers.

2000 ◽  
pp. 79-81
Author(s):  
Jørgen Winkel ◽  
Rolf Westgaard
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Worker Safety ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Individual Risk Factors

The reduction of slip and fall injuries: Part I – Guidelines for the practitioner * *The recommendations provided in this guide are based on numerous published and unpublished scientific studies and are intended to enhance worker safety and productivity. These recommendations are neither intended to replace existing standards, if any, nor should be treated as standards. Furthermore, this document should not be construed to represent institutional policy.The following individuals participated in the discussion of the earlier version of this guide. Their suggestions (written or verbal) were incorporated by the authors in this version: Roland Andersson, Sweden; Alvah Bittner, USA; Peter Buckle, UK; Jan Dul, The Netherlands; Bahador Ghahramani, USA; Juhani Ilmarinen, Finland; Sheik Imrhan, USA; Asa Kilbom, Sweden; Stephan Konz, USA; Shrawan Kumar, Canada; Mark Lehto, USA; William Marras, USA; Barbara McPhee, Australia; James Miller, USA; Anil Mital, USA; Don Morelli, USA; Maurice Oxenburgh, Australia; Jerry Purswell, USA; Jorma Saari, Finland; W. (Tom) Singleton, UK; Juhani Smolander, Finland; Terry Stobbe, USA; Rolf Westgaard, Norway, Jørgen Winkel, Sweden. The guide was also reviewed in depth by several anonymous reviewers.

2000 ◽  
pp. 179-182
Author(s):  
Tom B. Leamon
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Worker Safety ◽  
Fall Injuries

Repetitive work of the upper extremity: Part I–Guidelines for the practitioner * *The recommendations provided in this guide are based on numerous published and unpublished scientific studies and are intended to enhance worker safety and productivity. These recommendations are neither intended to replace existing standards, if any, nor should be treated as standards. Furthermore, this document should not be construed to represent institutional policy.The following individuals participated in the discussion of the earlier version of this guide. Their suggestions (written or verbal) were incorporated by the authors in this version: Arne Aaras, Norway; Fred Aghazadeh, USA; Roland Andersson, Sweden; Jan Dul, The Netherlands; Jeffrey Fernandez, USA; Ingvar Holmér, Sweden; Matthias Jäger, Germany; Anders Kjellberg, Sweden; Olli Korhonen, Finland; Helmut Krueger, Switzerland; Shrawan Kumar, Canada; Ulf Landström, Sweden; Tom Leamon, USA; Anil Mital, USA; Ruth Nielsen, Denmark; Jerry Ramsey, USA; Murray Sinclair, UK; Rolf Westgaard, Norway; Ann Williamson, Australia; Jørgen Winkel, Sweden; Pia Zätterström, Sweden. The guide was also reviewed in depth by several anonymous reviewers.

2000 ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Åsa Kilbom
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Worker Safety ◽  
Repetitive Work

Allocation of functions to humans and machines in a manufacturing environment: Part I – Guidelines for the practitioner * *The recommendations provided in this guide are based on numerous published and unpublished scientific studies and are intended to enhance worker safety and productivity. These recommendations are neither intended to replace existing standards, if any, nor should be treated as standards. Furthermore, this document should not be construed to represent institutional policy.The following individuals participated in the discussion of the earlier version of this guide. Their suggestions (written or verbal) were incorporated by the authors in this version: Arne Aaras, Norway; Fred Aghazadeh, USA; Roland Andersson, Sweden; Jan Dul, The Netherlands; Jeffrey Fernandez, USA; Ingvar Holmér, Sweden; Matthias Jäger, Germany; Asa Kilbom, Sweden; Anders Kjellberg, Sweden; Olli Korhonen, Finland; Helmut Krueger, Switzerland; Shrawan Kumar, Canada; Ulf Landström, Sweden; Tom Leamon, USA; Ruth Nielsen, Denmark, Jerry Ramsey, USA; Rolf Westgaard, Norway; Ann Williamson, Australia; Jørgen Winkel, Sweden; Pia Zätterström, Sweden. The guide was also reviewed in depth by several anonymous reviewers.

2000 ◽  
pp. 33-59
Author(s):  
Anil Mital ◽  
Arif Motorwala ◽  
Mangesh Kulkarni ◽  
Murray Sinclair ◽  
Carys Siemieniuch
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Worker Safety ◽  
Manufacturing Environment

Evaluation and control of hot working environments: Part I – Guidelines for the practitioner * *The recommendations provided in this guide are based on numerous published and unpublished scientific studies and are intended to enhance worker safety and productivity. These recommendations are neither intended to replace existing standards, if any, nor should be treated as standards. Furthermore, this document should not be construed to represent institutional policy.The following individuals participated in the discussion of the earlier version of this guide. Their suggestions (written or verbal) were incorporated by the authors in this version: Arne Aaras, Norway; Fred Aghazadeh, USA; Roland Andersson, Sweden; Jan Dul, The Netherlands; Jeffrey Fernandez, USA; Ingvar Holmér, Sweden; Matthias Jäger, Germany; Åsa Kilbom, Sweden; Anders Kjellberg, Sweden; Olli Korhonen, Finland; Helmut Krueger, Switzerland; Shrawan Kumar, Canada; Ulf Landström, Sweden; Tom Leamon, USA; Anil Mital, USA; Ruth Nielsen, Denmark, Murray Sinclair, UK; Rolf Westgaard, Norway; Ann Williamson, Australia; Jørgen Winkel, Sweden; Pia Zätterström, Sweden. The guide was also reviewed in depth by several anonymous reviewers.

2000 ◽  
pp. 329-336
Author(s):  
Jerry D. Ramsey ◽  
Thomas E. Bernard ◽  
Francis N. Dukes-Dobos
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Hot Working ◽  
Worker Safety ◽  
Working Environments ◽  
And Control
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document