Protecting the Public Through the National Practitioner Data Bank and Nursys® Compliance: An Exploratory Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 46-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Benton ◽  
Nur Rajwany
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 162-164
Author(s):  
Richard Robbins ◽  

No abstract available. Article truncated after 150 words. State regulatory boards that regulate professionals such as doctors, nurses, psychologists, etc. are often appointed by politicians and headed by lawyers. Under this category has been most Medical Boards and their parent organization the Federation of State Medical Boards. Although they claim to be protecting the public, they seem more concerned with identifying “disruptive” physicians and blacklisting them through the National Practitioner Data Bank (1). However, in July the Federation issued a warning to physicians against propagating COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and disinformation citing a "dramatic increase" by physicians (2). The statement gave some hope that the Federation was striving to maintain some degree of professional standards by saying that spreading disinformation to the public was dangerous because physicians enjoy a high degree of public credibility. The Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners followed the Federation’s lead by issuing a verbatim restatement warning that physicians who spread false information about COVID-19 vaccinations …


JAMA ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 268 (24) ◽  
pp. 3429
Author(s):  
Bernard S. Goffen

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 672-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali S Saber Tehrani ◽  
HeeWon Lee ◽  
Simon C Mathews ◽  
Andrew Shore ◽  
Martin A Makary ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 265 (17) ◽  
pp. 2193b-2193
Author(s):  
D. J. Segan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document