Persistent drug shortages jeopardise patient safety in the USA

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryant Furlow
2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Tedesco ◽  
Tina Hernandez-Boussard ◽  
Elisa Carretta ◽  
Paola Rucci ◽  
Maurizia Rolli ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rumyana Stoyanova ◽  
Rositsa Dimova ◽  
Miglena Tarnovska ◽  
Tatyana Boeva ◽  
Rosen Dimov ◽  
...  

Background and aims. Patient safety culture (PSC) is an essential component of the quality of healthcare. Improving PSC is considered a priority in many developed countries. A specialized software platform for registration and evaluation of hospital patient safety culture has been developed with the support of the Medical University Plovdiv Project №11/2017. The aim of the study is to assess the status of PSC in Bulgarian hospitals and to compare it to that in USA and Croatian hospitals. Methods. The study was conducted from June 01 to July 31, 2018 using the web-based Bulgarian Version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire (B-HSOPSC). Two hundred and forty-eight medical professionals from different hospitals in Bulgaria participated in the study. In order to quantify the differences of positive scores distributions for each of the 42 HSOPSC items between Bulgarian, Croatian and USA samples, the χ2-test was applied. The research hypothesis assumed that there were no significant differences between the Bulgarian, Croatian and US PSCs. Results. The results revealed 14 significant differences in the positive scores between the Bulgarian and Croatian PSCs and 15 between the Bulgarian and the USA PSC, respectively. Bulgarian medical professionals provided less positive responses to 12 items compared with Croatian and USA respondents. The Bulgarian respondents were more positive compared to Croatians on the feedback and communication of medical errors (Items - C1, C4, C5) as well as on the employment of locum staff (A7) and the frequency of reported mistakes (D1). Bulgarian medical professionals were more positive compared with their USA colleagues on the communication of information at shift handover and across hospital units (F5, F7). The distribution of positive scores on items: “Staff worry that their mistakes are kept in their personnel file” (RA16), “Things ‘fall between the cracks’ when transferring patients from one unit to another” (RF3) and “Shift handovers are problematic for patients in this hospital” (RF11) were significantly higher among Bulgarian respondents compared with Croatian and US respondents. Conclusions. Significant differences of positive scores distribution were found between Bulgarian and USA PSC on one hand and between Bulgarian and Croatian on the other. The study reveals that distribution of positive responses could be explained by the cultural, organizational and healthcare system differences.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 412-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Granel ◽  
Josep Maria Manresa-Domínguez ◽  
Anita Barth ◽  
Katalin Papp ◽  
Maria Dolors Bernabeu-Tamayo

Purpose The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) is a rigorously designed tool for measuring inpatient safety culture. The purpose of this paper is to develop a cross-cultural HSOPSC for Hungary and determine its strengths and weaknesses. Design/methodology/approach The original US version was translated and adapted using existing guidelines. Healthcare workers (n=371) including nurses, physicians and other healthcare staff from six Hungarian hospitals participated. Answers were analyzed using exploratory factor analyses and reliability tests. Findings Positive responses in all dimensions were lower in Hungary than in the USA. Half the participants considered their work area “acceptable” regarding patient safety. Healthcare staff worked in “crisis mode,” trying to accomplish too much and too quickly. The authors note that a “blame culture” does not facilitate patient safety improvements in Hungary. Practical implications The results provide valuable information for promoting a more positive patient safety culture in Hungary and for evaluating future strategies to improve patient safety. Originality/value Introducing a validated scale to measure patient safety culture in Hungary improves healthcare quality.


Health Policy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 122 (12) ◽  
pp. 1302-1309 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Said ◽  
Ralf Goebel ◽  
Matthias Ganso ◽  
Petra Zagermann-Muncke ◽  
Martin Schulz

2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 943-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. MacDonald Elyse ◽  
R. Fox Erin ◽  
S. Tyler Linda

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. maapoc.0000012
Author(s):  
Jigar M. Patel ◽  
Erin R. Fox ◽  
Mark Zocchi ◽  
Zone-En Lee ◽  
Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi

Introduction Drug shortages have become more severe in recent years; however, data describing how such shortages impact gastroenterology (GI) drugs are limited. We characterize longitudinal trends of drug shortages in the USA within the scope of GI practice. Methods Drug shortage data from the University of Utah Drug Information Service were analyzed from January 2001 to December 2014. A board certified gastroenterologist, an internal medicine physician, and a clinical pharmacist identified drug shortages within the scope of GI practice, whether they are used for high-acuity conditions, availability, formulation, or therapeutic category. Trends in the length of shortages for GI drugs were described using standard descriptive statistics and regression analysis. Results A total of 1,774 drug shortages were reported over the 14-year period. Of those, 253 shortages (14.3%) were classified within the scope of GI practice. The number of newly-reported GI drug shortages increased from 15 in 2001 to 44 in 2014. The majority of GI drugs (55.7%) were parenteral and 102 shortages (40.3%) were single source drugs. By the end of the study period, 44 (17.4%) GI drugs remained on active shortage with a median duration of 24.3 months (interquartile range [IQR] 6.9–32.1). The median duration for resolved shortages of GI drugs was 7.7 months (IQR 2.9–17.6). Conclusions There was a significant increase in shortages of drugs used in GI practice from 2001 to 2014. Many of these drugs were used for high-acuity conditions and alternative agents were also impacted. Gastroenterologists must be cognizant of current shortages in order to mitigate impact on patient care.


2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milena M. McLaughlin ◽  
Erik W. Skoglund

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document