Continuity and Change in Prison Gang Membership

2019 ◽  
pp. 217-250
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert McLean ◽  
Chris Holligan

Glasgow has a persistent and historical gang culture. Dimensions of ‘the gang’ are widely recognized in terms of behavior, formation, membership, and territoriality. The gap in our knowledge lies in the nature of a gang’s evolutionary flexibility. Given that life-course criminology foregrounds continuity and change in offending, it is surprising that this evolution has gone unrecognized in Scotland. Many contemporary studies of youth gangs connect ‘gang talk’ exclusively with territoriality and masculinity overlooking criminal progression. The argument of this article does not dispute the dominant received conceptualization of the youth urban street gang. The article’s contribution is to progress beyond these narrowing tropes and chronological age boundaries to encompass a more complex portrayal of Glasgow gangs and the lives of the indigenous Scottish young lads who were interviewed. The article does this by voicing the lived experiences of those whose lives are enmeshed with gang membership and whose linguistic register rarely achieves a serious platform in the middle-class world in control of the British media.


2021 ◽  
pp. 002242782098659
Author(s):  
Sadaf Hashimi ◽  
Sara Wakefield ◽  
Robert Apel

Objectives: The processes driving gang entry and disengagement are central to classic and contemporary criminological research on gang involvement. Yet, the role of delinquent peer friendship networks in contouring gang membership has driven much of criminological research, with little empirical research devoted to understanding sibling influences on the gang career. Method: The study uses the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 to examine the transmission of gang membership among similar-aged siblings. These data offer the opportunity to use siblings’ self-report of gang involvement as a determinant of focal youths’ self-report of gang involvement while treating gang entry, persistence, and exit (and reentry) as unique transitions with potentially asymmetric determinants. Results: Results from the event history models indicate that gang involved siblings increase the hazard of entry and re-entry into the gang but have little influence on exit decisions. Sibling configurations with respect to sex and age-order further conditions these relations, with brothers and older siblings most influential. Conclusion: Ties to siblings serve as a salient and intimate type of social tie with siblings serving multiplex roles in each other’s lives. Findings lend additional insight on crime concentration in family networks and advance our understanding of continuity and change in gang involvement


2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Pyrooz ◽  
Gary Sweeten ◽  
Alex R. Piquero

Author(s):  
James A. Densley

This article examines the who, what, where, when, why, and how of gang joining. The question of what youth join when they join gangs speaks to the contested nature of gang definitions and types and the consequences of gang membership, specifically heightened levels of offending and victimization. The type of gang and the obligations of membership influence the joining process. Where youth join gangs, namely, the neighborhood and social context, also impacts individual opportunities and preferences for joining. When youth join gangs is considered in a developmental sense, to include both adolescent and adult onset, in order to account for continuity and change in individual levels of immersion or “embeddedness” in gangs across the life course. Who joins gangs provides a profile of gang membership grounded in the well-documented risk factors for gang membership, but limited by problems of prediction. Why youth join gangs speaks to the push and pull factors for membership, the appeal of gangs, and the selective incentives they offer. Still, motivations for gang membership cannot fully explain selection into gangs, nor can general theories of crime that do not necessarily fit with general knowledge of gangs. How youth join gangs, for example, is more complicated than initiation rites. The mechanisms underlying the selection process can be understood through the lens of signaling theory, with implications for practice.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence P. Thornberry ◽  
Shawn Bushway ◽  
Marvin D. Krohn ◽  
Alan J. Lizotte
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne M. Chung ◽  
Richard W. Robins ◽  
Kali H. Trzesniewski ◽  
Brent W. Roberts ◽  
Erik E. Noftle ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Dickinson ◽  
Milton A. Fuentes ◽  
Brian Yankouski ◽  
Jennifer Gaskins ◽  
Catherine L. Ward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document