The Three-Dimensional Wave Equation

2020 ◽  
pp. 394-396
2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 1181-1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Smith ◽  
S. Tsynkov ◽  
E. Turkel

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessé C. Costa ◽  
Débora Mondini ◽  
Jörg Schleicher ◽  
Amélia Novais

Three-dimensional wave-equation migration techniques are still quite expensive because of the huge matrices that need to be inverted. Several techniques have been proposed to reduce this cost by splitting the full 3D problem into a sequence of 2D problems. We compare the performance of splitting techniques for stable 3D Fourier finite-difference (FFD) migration techniques in terms of image quality and computational cost. The FFD methods are complex Padé FFD and FFD plus interpolation, and the compared splitting techniques are two- and four-way splitting as well as alternating four-way splitting, that is, splitting into the coordinate directions at one depth and the diagonal directions at the next depth level. From numerical examples in homogeneous and inhomogeneous media, we conclude that, though theoretically less accurate, alternate four-way splitting yields results of comparable quality as full four-way splitting at the cost of two-way splitting.


2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (02) ◽  
pp. 283-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARKUS HALTMEIER

This paper is concerned with a version of photoacoustic tomography, that uses line shaped detectors (instead of point-like ones) for the recording of acoustic data. The three-dimensional image reconstruction problem is reduced to a series of two-dimensional ones. First, the initial data of the two-dimensional wave equation is recovered from boundary data, and second, the classical two-dimensional Radon transform is inverted. We discuss uniqueness and stability of reconstruction, and compare frequency domain reconstruction formulas for various geometries.


1977 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2407-2408
Author(s):  
H. F. Jones ◽  
B. Mathur

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document