inverse scattering
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

4000
(FIVE YEARS 419)

H-INDEX

95
(FIVE YEARS 13)

2022 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. C112-C127
Author(s):  
Mahadevan Ganesh ◽  
Stuart Collin Hawkins ◽  
Nino Kordzakhia ◽  
Stefanie Unicomb

We present an efficient Bayesian algorithm for identifying the shape of an object from noisy far field data. The data is obtained by illuminating the object with one or more incident waves. Bayes' theorem provides a framework to find a posterior distribution of the parameters that determine the shape of the scatterer. We compute the distribution using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method with a Gibbs sampler. The principal novelty of this work is to replace the forward far-field-ansatz wave model (in an unbounded region) in the MCMC sampling with a neural-network-based surrogate that is hundreds of times faster to evaluate. We demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of our algorithm by constructing the distributions, medians and confidence intervals of non-convex shapes using a Gaussian random circle prior. References Y. Chen. Inverse scattering via Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Inv. Prob. 13 (1997), pp. 253–282. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/13/2/005 D. Colton and R. Kress. Inverse acoustic and electromagnetic scattering theory. 4th Edition. Vol. 93. Applied Mathematical Sciences. References C112 Springer, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-30351-8 R. DeVore, B. Hanin, and G. Petrova. Neural Network Approximation. Acta Num. 30 (2021), pp. 327–444. doi: 10.1017/S0962492921000052 M. Ganesh and S. C. Hawkins. A reduced-order-model Bayesian obstacle detection algorithm. 2018 MATRIX Annals. Ed. by J. de Gier et al. Springer, 2020, pp. 17–27. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-38230-8_2 M. Ganesh and S. C. Hawkins. Algorithm 975: TMATROM—A T-matrix reduced order model software. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 44.9 (2017), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1145/3054945 M. Ganesh and S. C. Hawkins. Scattering by stochastic boundaries: hybrid low- and high-order quantification algorithms. ANZIAM J. 56 (2016), pp. C312–C338. doi: 10.21914/anziamj.v56i0.9313 M. Ganesh, S. C. Hawkins, and D. Volkov. An efficient algorithm for a class of stochastic forward and inverse Maxwell models in R3. J. Comput. Phys. 398 (2019), p. 108881. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108881 L. Lamberg, K. Muinonen, J. Ylönen, and K. Lumme. Spectral estimation of Gaussian random circles and spheres. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 136 (2001), pp. 109–121. doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00578-1 T. Nousiainen and G. M. McFarquhar. Light scattering by quasi-spherical ice crystals. J. Atmos. Sci. 61 (2004), pp. 2229–2248. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<2229:LSBQIC>2.0.CO;2 A. Palafox, M. A. Capistrán, and J. A. Christen. Point cloud-based scatterer approximation and affine invariant sampling in the inverse scattering problem. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 40 (2017), pp. 3393–3403. doi: 10.1002/mma.4056 M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 378 (2019), pp. 686–707. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 A. C. Stuart. Inverse problems: A Bayesian perspective. Acta Numer. 19 (2010), pp. 451–559. doi: 10.1017/S0962492910000061 B. Veihelmann, T. Nousiainen, M. Kahnert, and W. J. van der Zande. Light scattering by small feldspar particles simulated using the Gaussian random sphere geometry. J. Quant. Spectro. Rad. Trans. 100 (2006), pp. 393–405. doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2005.11.053


Mathematics ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
Andreas Tataris ◽  
Tristan van Leeuwen

We study the inverse scattering problem for a Schrödinger operator related to a static wave operator with variable velocity, using the GLM (Gelfand–Levitan–Marchenko) integral equation. We assume to have noisy scattering data, and we derive a stability estimate for the error of the solution of the GLM integral equation by showing the invertibility of the GLM operator between suitable function spaces. To regularise the problem, we formulate a variational total least squares problem, and we show that, under certain regularity assumptions, the optimisation problem admits minimisers. Finally, we compute numerically the regularised solution of the GLM equation using the total least squares method in a discrete sense.


2022 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Harju ◽  
Jaakko Kultima ◽  
Valery Serov

Abstract We consider an inverse scattering problem of recovering the unknown coefficients of a quasi-linearly perturbed biharmonic operator in the three-dimensional case. These unknown complex-valued coefficients are assumed to satisfy some regularity conditions on their nonlinearity, but they can be discontinuous or singular in their space variable. We prove Saito’s formula and uniqueness theorem of recovering some essential information about the unknown coefficients from the knowledge of the high frequency scattering amplitude.


2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
Gianluca Gennarelli ◽  
Giovanni Ludeno ◽  
Noviello Carlo ◽  
Ilaria Catapano ◽  
Francesco Soldovieri

This paper deals with 3D and 2D linear inverse scattering approaches based on the Born approximation, and investigates how the model dimensionality influences the imaging performance. The analysis involves dielectric objects hosted in a homogenous and isotropic medium and a multimonostatic/multifrequency measurement configuration. A theoretical study of the spatial resolution is carried out by exploiting the singular value decomposition of 3D and 2D scattering operators. Reconstruction results obtained from synthetic data generated by using a 3D full-wave electromagnetic simulator are reported to support the conclusions drawn from the analysis of resolution limits. The presented analysis corroborates that 3D and 2D inversion approaches have almost identical imaging performance, unless data are severely corrupted by the noise.


Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 3104
Author(s):  
Hongsheng Wu ◽  
Xuhu Ren ◽  
Liang Guo ◽  
Zhengzhe Li

The main purpose of this paper is to solve the electromagnetic inverse scattering problem (ISP). Compared with conventional tomography technology, it considers the interaction between the internal structure of the scene and the electromagnetic wave in a more realistic manner. However, due to the nonlinearity of ISP, the conventional calculation scheme usually has some problems, such as the unsatisfactory imaging effect and high computational cost. To solve these problems and improve the imaging quality, this paper presents a simple method named the diagonal matrix inversion method (DMI) to estimate the distribution of scatterer contrast (DSC) and a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) which could optimize the DSC obtained by DMI and make it closer to the real distribution of scatterer contrast. In order to make the distribution of scatterer contrast generated by GAN more accurate, the forward model is embedded in the GAN. Moreover, because of the existence of the forward model, not only is the DSC generated by the generator similar to the original distribution of the scatterer contrast in the numerical distribution, but the numerical of each point is also approximate to the original.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document