There Is No Place for Natural and Mild Stimulation IVF

2021 ◽  
pp. 228-229
Author(s):  
Raj Mathur
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyue Zhang ◽  
Ting Feng ◽  
Jihong Yang ◽  
Yingying Hao ◽  
Suying Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ovarian responsiveness to controlled ovarian stimulation is essential for a successful clinical outcome in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. We aimed to find a suitable new ovulation stimulation protocol for poor ovarian response (POR) patients over 40 years old. Methods A retrospective analysis of 488 ART cycles was evaluated from January 2015 to June 2019. Comparisons were made between the flexible short protocol (FSP), routine short protocol and mild stimulation protocol. Results Compared with the routine short protocol, the FSP delayed the gonadotropin start time and reduced the total gonadotropin dose per stimulation cycle. At the same time, compared with the mild stimulation protocol, the FSP improved oocyte quality and embryo quality and improved embryo implantation potential after transfer. Furthermore, the use of the FSP reduced the probability of premature ovulation, as it inhibited the premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge to a certain extent. Conclusions The FSP yielded better outcomes than other protocols for patients with POR over 40 years old in our study. However, further prospective studies are needed to provide more substantial evidence and to determine whether the FSP can be successful for both patients over 40 years group and younger POR patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 329-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Madani ◽  
M Hemat ◽  
A Arabipoor ◽  
SH Khodabakhshi ◽  
Z Zolfaghari

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 2523-2530 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. la Cour Freiesleben ◽  
K. Lossl ◽  
J. Bogstad ◽  
H.E. Bredkjaer ◽  
B. Toft ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. e230-e231
Author(s):  
Q. Chen ◽  
Y. Che ◽  
Y. Wang ◽  
Y. Kuang

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1964-1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
N P Polyzos ◽  
B Popovic-Todorovic

ABSTRACT Over the last 25 years, a vast body of literature has been published evaluating different treatment modalities for the management of poor ovarian responders. Despite the evidence that maximizing ovarian response can improve the chances of live born babies in poor responders, there are still voices suggesting that all poor responders are the same, irrespective of their age and their actual ovarian reserve. This has resulted in the suggestion of adopting a mild ovarian stimulation approach for all poor responders, based on the results of several trials which failed to identity differences when comparing mild and more intense stimulation in predicted poor responders. The current article analyzes in detail these studies and discusses the shortcomings in terms of type of population included, outcomes and settings performed, which may actually be responsible for the belief that only mild stimulation should be used. In the era of individualization in medicine, it must be realized that there are subgroups of predicted poor responders who will benefit from an individual rather than ‘one fits all’ mild stimulation approach and thus we should provide the same standard of treatment for all our poor responder patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document