scholarly journals Influencing trade policy in a multi-level system—understanding corporate political activity in the context of global value chains and regime complexity

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Curran ◽  
Jappe Eckhardt

AbstractThe increasing impact of the international trade governance regime on the domestic regulatory sphere and the growing inter-linkages between international companies through their involvement in global value chains, have complicated corporate political activity (CPA) in the trade arena and changed the way companies interact with governments in this context. This paper draws on several recent examples of novel forms of CPA in trade conflicts at both multilateral and regional (E.U.) level, to provide an updated conceptual framework of trade policy CPA, which takes account of the increasing complexity and interconnectedness in the world economy. We highlight, in particular, the fact that this changing context means that “domestic” interests are often heterogeneous. The international linkages of a firm may dictate trade policy preferences more than its nationality. In addition, non-government actors increasingly react to globalization by mobilizing transnationally, with positive and negative impacts for CPA. CPA strategy has adapted to that reality, in both home and host country contexts, leading to novel cross border alliances and even political activity in countries where, although their local presence is relatively low, companies find common interests.

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 651-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter IJtsma ◽  
Peter Levell ◽  
Bart Los ◽  
Marcel P. Timmer

Author(s):  
Leonardo Baccini

The proliferation of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) is a key feature of this current wave of globalization. This chapter surveys the literature related to determinants of PTAs and their consequences. The key findings of the literature are two-fold. First, the expansion of global value chains is the main driver of the formation of PTAs. Second, PTAs generate stark distributional consequences among firms with large productive firms reaping the lion’s share of the gains from trade. Given that the welfare effect of preferential liberalization is generally small, forming PTAs is likely to remain a controversial trade policy among politicians and voters.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ari Van Assche ◽  
Byron Gangnes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document