Extraterritorial obligations, financial globalisation and macroeconomic governance

Author(s):  
Radhika Balakrishnan ◽  
James Heintz
World Economy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1774-1795
Author(s):  
Tony Cavoli ◽  
Sasidaran Gopalan ◽  
Ramkishen S. Rajan

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (No. 12) ◽  
pp. 548-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brzozowska Anna ◽  
Bubel Dagmara ◽  
Kalinichenko Antonina ◽  
 Nekrasenko Larysa

The paper is an attempt to address the advantages and risks connected with the wave of financial globalisation, with a focus on its impact on financial policy in European agriculture. The aim of the paper is to identify the basic conditions of the functioning and change of the financial system of agriculture under the conditions of the globalisation of financial markets. Financial globalisation, also referred to as financial integration or openness, is understood as an increase in global ties and interdependences caused by capital flows. Potentially, globalisation can bring a lot of benefits, which are manifested in an acceleration of economic growth and decreased fluctuation in consumption, which should further improve the level of overall prosperity. On the other hand, however, internationalisation of financial flows entails a range of threats, including the possibility of crisis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-104
Author(s):  
Simplice A. Asongu ◽  
Joseph Nnanna

This study unites two streams of research by simultaneously focusing on the impact of financial globalisation on financial development and pre- and post-crisis dynamics of the investigated relationship. The empirical evidence is based on 53 African countries for the period 2004–2011 and Generalised Method of Moments. The following findings are established. First, whereas marginal effects from financial globalisation are positive on financial dynamics of activity and size, corresponding net effects (positive thresholds) are negative (within range). Second, while decreasing financial globalisation returns are apparent for financial dynamics of depth and efficiency, corresponding net effects (negative thresholds) are positive (not within range). Third, financial development dynamics are more weakly stationary and strongly convergent in the pre-crisis period. Fourth, the net effect from the: pre-crisis period is lower on money supply and banking system efficiency; post-crisis period is positive on financial system efficiency and pre-crisis period is positive on financial size. JEL Codes: F02, F21, F30, F40, O10


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document