A History of Eighteenth-Century Literature (1660-1780)

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmund Gosse
Author(s):  
Matthew H. Birkhold

The Introduction raises the main questions answered by the book: how were characters regulated before the existence of intellectual property laws? Why does fan fiction proliferate after 1750? And how did fan fiction and its rules affect authorship and the law? It further provides a brief history of fan fiction from Homer to Goethe and offers an explanation of the methodology used in this text, combining legal anthropology, literary criticism, and historical analysis based on archival work. The Introduction places the work within existing scholarship on legal history, studies of eighteenth-century literature and the book trade, and intellectual property law.


PMLA ◽  
1922 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 662-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Sprague Allen

At two periods in the eighteenth century, literature was more closely and more frequently associated than is its wont, with immediately contemporary events, and instead of being a disinterested interpretation of life it was enlisted in the service of propaganda. At the outset of the century party-politics, the bickering of Whig and Tory, more than once roused Defoe, Arbuthnot, Addison, and Swift to seize a polemic pen, and from the tumult of controversy emerged works like The Campaign amd The History of John Bull, inspired as much by anticipated rewards as by agitated feelings. Again, at the close of the century, in the presence of such a social upheaval as the French Revolution, it was impossible for thinking men to remain neutral. Problems, born of the intellectual ferment of the age and concerned with the fundamental issues of religion, morals, and government, stirred men to a white heat of partisanship and set them writing passionately, according to their sympathies, in behalf of liberty, equality, the state of nature and civilization, Christianity and atheism, and traditional ethics and individualistic morality. Losing contact with beauty, imaginative literature indeed at this time too often staggers under a weight of social philosophy.


Author(s):  
Matthew Risling

Abstract This article explores eighteenth-century questions surrounding the spatiotemporal nature of the field we now call ‘science’. Today’s commonplace notion of ‘modern Western science’ assumes conceptual binaries that do not map onto eighteenth-century discourses. The article focuses on two works by the so-called Scriblerians—Three Hours after Marriage (1717), and Memoirs of Martinus Scriblerus (1714, pub. 1741)—which satirize the much-maligned Dr John Woodward and, ostensibly, the philosophical mode he represented. Though these texts are satirical, the article does not posit a clash of cultures. Instead, it examines a set of tropes, shared by numerous authors at various purposes, which inflected science with the narratological space-time of the ancient Orient. This ‘Oriental chronotope’ (in Bakhtinian terms) speaks to the complex space that science occupied in emerging narratives of Western modernity. The Eastern artefacts featured in these works, and their shared themes of dubious reproduction, establish an unlikely affinity with Thomas Sprat’s History of the Royal Society (1667), which offers the new sciences as a dialectic between the ancient and modern worlds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document