scholarly journals Large Cliques in a Power-Law Random Graph

2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (04) ◽  
pp. 1124-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svante Janson ◽  
Tomasz Łuczak ◽  
Ilkka Norros

In this paper we study the size of the largest clique ω(G(n, α)) in a random graph G(n, α) on n vertices which has power-law degree distribution with exponent α. We show that, for ‘flat’ degree sequences with α > 2, with high probability, the largest clique in G(n, α) is of a constant size, while, for the heavy tail distribution, when 0 < α < 2, ω(G(n, α)) grows as a power of n. Moreover, we show that a natural simple algorithm with high probability finds in G(n, α) a large clique of size (1 − o(1))ω(G(n, α)) in polynomial time.

2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 1124-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svante Janson ◽  
Tomasz Łuczak ◽  
Ilkka Norros

In this paper we study the size of the largest clique ω(G(n, α)) in a random graph G(n, α) on n vertices which has power-law degree distribution with exponent α. We show that, for ‘flat’ degree sequences with α > 2, with high probability, the largest clique in G(n, α) is of a constant size, while, for the heavy tail distribution, when 0 < α < 2, ω(G(n, α)) grows as a power of n. Moreover, we show that a natural simple algorithm with high probability finds in G(n, α) a large clique of size (1 − o(1))ω(G(n, α)) in polynomial time.


10.37236/702 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Chung ◽  
Mary Radcliffe

We consider random graphs such that each edge is determined by an independent random variable, where the probability of each edge is not assumed to be equal. We use a Chernoff inequality for matrices to show that the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix and the normalized Laplacian of such a random graph can be approximated by those of the weighted expectation graph, with error bounds dependent upon the minimum and maximum expected degrees. In particular, we use these results to bound the spectra of random graphs with given expected degree sequences, including random power law graphs. Moreover, we prove a similar result giving concentration of the spectrum of a matrix martingale on its expectation.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
István Fazekas ◽  
Bettina Porvázsnyik

A random graph evolution mechanism is defined. The evolution studied is a combination of the preferential attachment model and the interaction of four vertices. The asymptotic behaviour of the graph is described. It is proved that the graph exhibits a power law degree distribution; in other words, it is scale-free. It turns out that any exponent in(2,∞)can be achieved. The proofs are based on martingale methods.


Algorithmica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 82 (11) ◽  
pp. 3338-3389
Author(s):  
Ankit Chauhan ◽  
Tobias Friedrich ◽  
Ralf Rothenberger

Abstract Large real-world networks typically follow a power-law degree distribution. To study such networks, numerous random graph models have been proposed. However, real-world networks are not drawn at random. Therefore, Brach et al. (27th symposium on discrete algorithms (SODA), pp 1306–1325, 2016) introduced two natural deterministic conditions: (1) a power-law upper bound on the degree distribution (PLB-U) and (2) power-law neighborhoods, that is, the degree distribution of neighbors of each vertex is also upper bounded by a power law (PLB-N). They showed that many real-world networks satisfy both properties and exploit them to design faster algorithms for a number of classical graph problems. We complement their work by showing that some well-studied random graph models exhibit both of the mentioned PLB properties. PLB-U and PLB-N hold with high probability for Chung–Lu Random Graphs and Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs and almost surely for Hyperbolic Random Graphs. As a consequence, all results of Brach et al. also hold with high probability or almost surely for those random graph classes. In the second part we study three classical $$\textsf {NP}$$ NP -hard optimization problems on PLB networks. It is known that on general graphs with maximum degree $$\Delta$$ Δ , a greedy algorithm, which chooses nodes in the order of their degree, only achieves a $$\Omega (\ln \Delta )$$ Ω ( ln Δ ) -approximation for Minimum Vertex Cover and Minimum Dominating Set, and a $$\Omega (\Delta )$$ Ω ( Δ ) -approximation for Maximum Independent Set. We prove that the PLB-U property with $$\beta >2$$ β > 2 suffices for the greedy approach to achieve a constant-factor approximation for all three problems. We also show that these problems are -hard even if PLB-U, PLB-N, and an additional power-law lower bound on the degree distribution hold. Hence, a PTAS cannot be expected unless = . Furthermore, we prove that all three problems are in if the PLB-U property holds.


2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (01) ◽  
pp. 139-165
Author(s):  
Kaisheng Lin ◽  
Gesine Reinert

In a random graph, counts for the number of vertices with given degrees will typically be dependent. We show via a multivariate normal and a Poisson process approximation that, for graphs which have independent edges, with a possibly inhomogeneous distribution, only when the degrees are large can we reasonably approximate the joint counts as independent. The proofs are based on Stein's method and the Stein-Chen method with a new size-biased coupling for such inhomogeneous random graphs, and, hence, bounds on the distributional distance are obtained. Finally, we illustrate that apparent (pseudo-)power-law-type behaviour can arise in such inhomogeneous networks despite not actually following a power-law degree distribution.


10.37236/4958 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Bode ◽  
Nikolaos Fountoulakis ◽  
Tobias Müller

We consider a model for complex networks that was introduced by Krioukov et al.  In this model, $N$ points are chosen randomly inside a disk on the hyperbolic plane and any two of them are joined by an  edge if they are within a certain hyperbolic distance.  The $N$ points are distributed according to a quasi-uniform distribution, which is a distorted version of  the uniform distribution. The model turns out to behave similarly to the well-known Chung-Lu model, but without the independence between the edges. Namely, it exhibits a power-law degree sequence and small distances but, unlike the Chung-Lu model and many other well-known models for complex networks, it also exhibits clustering. The model is controlled by two parameters $\alpha$ and $\nu$ where, roughly speaking, $\alpha$ controls the exponent of the power-law and $\nu$ controls the average degree. The present paper focuses on the evolution of the component structure of the random graph.  We show that (a) for $\alpha > 1$ and $\nu$ arbitrary, with high probability, as the number of vertices grows, the largest component of the random graph has sublinear order; (b) for $\alpha < 1$ and $\nu$ arbitrary with high probability there is a "giant" component  of linear order,  and (c) when $\alpha=1$ then there is a non-trivial phase transition for the existence of a linear-sized component in terms of $\nu$. A corrigendum was added to this paper 29 Dec 2018.


2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 672-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Stegehuis

AbstractWe study the average nearest-neighbour degree a(k) of vertices with degree k. In many real-world networks with power-law degree distribution, a(k) falls off with k, a property ascribed to the constraint that any two vertices are connected by at most one edge. We show that a(k) indeed decays with k in three simple random graph models with power-law degrees: the erased configuration model, the rank-1 inhomogeneous random graph, and the hyperbolic random graph. We find that in the large-network limit for all three null models, a(k) starts to decay beyond $n^{(\tau-2)/(\tau-1)}$ and then settles on a power law $a(k)\sim k^{\tau-3}$, with $\tau$ the degree exponent.


2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-165
Author(s):  
Kaisheng Lin ◽  
Gesine Reinert

In a random graph, counts for the number of vertices with given degrees will typically be dependent. We show via a multivariate normal and a Poisson process approximation that, for graphs which have independent edges, with a possibly inhomogeneous distribution, only when the degrees are large can we reasonably approximate the joint counts as independent. The proofs are based on Stein's method and the Stein-Chen method with a new size-biased coupling for such inhomogeneous random graphs, and, hence, bounds on the distributional distance are obtained. Finally, we illustrate that apparent (pseudo-)power-law-type behaviour can arise in such inhomogeneous networks despite not actually following a power-law degree distribution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document