Do Indirect Investment Barriers Contribute to Capital Market Segmentation?

2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 613-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
George P. Nishiotis

AbstractUsing a sample of emerging market closed-end funds, I find evidence that indirect investment barriers exert powerful effects on asset pricing differences across countries. I show that not only do indirect investment barriers contribute to international capital market segmentation, but also they can lead to segmentation even in the absence of strong capital inflow restrictions. This result is consistent with Bekaert and Harvey's (1995) conclusion that “other markets appear segmented even though foreigners have relatively free access to their capital markets” (p. 403). The empirical results of this paper provide a rational market segmentation explanation of both premiums and discounts in emerging market closed-end funds, and they are consistent with the deterrent effect of indirect barriers on equity flows to emerging markets found in the capital flow literature.

2000 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 85-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
VIHANG ERRUNZA ◽  
KED HOGAN ◽  
MAO-WEI HUNG

A simple asset pricing model is developed to take into account two important characteristics in global investments: market segmentation and noise trader risk. Our results show the removal of international investment barriers and cross-border listings have not led to a fully integrated international capital market. We also show that different degree of investor rationality across borders induces an additional component of risk premium which is related to the "noise spill-over effect".


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document