Fine needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland lesions reported immediately in a head and neck clinic

1993 ◽  
Vol 107 (11) ◽  
pp. 1025-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. J. Roland ◽  
A. W. Caslin ◽  
P. A. Smith ◽  
L. S. Turnbull ◽  
A. Panarese ◽  
...  

AbstractThis paper describes the application of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) performed on92 patients with salivary gland lesions in a Head and Neck Surgery Clinic. The aspirates were immediately reported by a cytopathologist and the reports conveyed to the surgeon during the same clinic visit. FNAC results were then compared with histology in those patients who underwent surgery and with the clinical course of the disease at subsequent clinic visits in patients where surgery was not performed. The cytological diagnosis was incorrect in five cases, one of which was a false negative result. There were no false positive results. The sensitivity was 90.9 per cent and the specificity 100 per cent. This rapid report system of fine needle aspiration cytology has been found to be safe, free of complications, and helpful in the planning of treatment.

2006 ◽  
Vol 121 (6) ◽  
pp. 571-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
D C Howlett ◽  
B Harper ◽  
M Quante ◽  
A Berresford ◽  
M Morley ◽  
...  

Aim: To establish the diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) within a regional cancer network, and to determine what service improvements may be required to allow successful implementation of an FNAC-based, ‘one-stop’ head and neck clinic, as proposed by the current National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines.Materials and methods: The Sussex cancer network serves a population of 1 200 000 and contains five hospitals within three acute trusts. In 2004, an audit was undertaken retrospectively to examine the diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of head and neck FNAC across the network. Comparisons were then made with the results of subsequent relevant surgery. For the purposes of the audit, FNAC was subdivided into three main groups: salivary gland, thyroid gland and neck node. As part of the data analysis, we also noted the clinical source of the FNAC and whether it was performed blind or under image guidance.Results: In 2004, 712 FNAC procedures were undertaken in 647 patients, 276 of whom underwent subsequent surgery. Fine needle aspiration cytology was non-diagnostic in 52 per cent of patients in the neck node group, in 50 per cent in the salivary gland group and in 30 per cent in the thyroid group. With these non-diagnostic results removed, statistical analysis was performed on data from those patients who had undergone both FNAC and subsequent surgery. This gave a sensitivity of 89 per cent and a specificity of 57 per cent in the neck node group, a sensitivity of 64 per cent and specificity of 100 per cent in the salivary gland group, and a sensitivity of 62 per cent and specificity of 86 per cent in the thyroid group. Diagnostic problems with FNAC were noted, particularly in the differentiation of reactive nodal hyperplasia from lymphoma and in diagnosing follicular thyroid lesions. Ultrasound guidance was used in 50 per cent of the thyroid FNAC procedures but in only a minority of patients in the neck node and salivary gland groups.Conclusion: This audit demonstrated widespread diagnostic difficulties associated with head and neck FNAC in a large patient sample. It is likely that these problems will be mirrored in other cancer networks. In order for one-stop head and neck clinics to succeed, the non-diagnostic rate of FNAC in particular must be minimised. There are strategies to enable this, depending on local resources, including increased access to cytologists or cytology technicians, diagnostic ultrasound, image guidance for FNAC and the use of ultrasound-guided core biopsy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2050
Author(s):  
Ulana Kotowski ◽  
Faris F. Brkic ◽  
Oskar Koperek ◽  
Eleonore Pablik ◽  
Stefan Grasl ◽  
...  

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is an important diagnostic tool for tumors of the head and neck. However, non-diagnostic or inconclusive results may occur and lead to delay in treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors that predict a successful FNAC. A retrospective search was performed to identify all patients who received an FNAC at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna. The variables were patients’ age and sex, localization and size of the punctured structure, previous radiotherapy, experience of the head and neck surgeon, experience of the pathologist and the FNAC result. Based on these parameters, a nomogram was subsequently created to predict the probability of accurate diagnosis. After performing 1221 FNACs, the size of the punctured lesion (p = 0.0010), the experience of the surgeon and the pathologist (p = 0.00003) were important factors for a successfully procedure and reliable result. FNACs performed in nodes smaller than 20 mm had a significantly worse diagnostic outcome compared to larger nodes (p = 0.0004). In conclusion, the key factors for a successful FNAC are nodal size and the experience of the head and neck surgeon and the pathologist.


2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiji Hosokawa ◽  
Satoru Takebayashi ◽  
Yutaka Sasaki ◽  
Yuuki Nakamura ◽  
Kazuya Shinmura ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Suheko Oyafuso ◽  
Adhemar Longatto Filho ◽  
Mauro Kasuo Ikeda

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was performed in 273 cases with suspicious masses of the head and neck, excluding the thyroid and salivary gland, at the A.C. Camargo Hospital from 1983 to 1989. The most frequently punctured site was the lymph nodes (n = 178), and the most common histologic diagnosis of malignancy was squamous cell carcinoma (n = 43). FNAC results were: 105 positive, 6 suspicious, 135 negative, and 27 unsatisfactory cases. There was a correlation between cytology and histology in 217 cases, with 102 true-positive, 76 true-negative, 1 false-positive, and 7 false-negative cases. Suspicious and unsatisfactory cases were not considered for this index. Analysis of the results showed an efficiency of 95.6%, sensitivity of 93.5%, and specificity of 98.7 %. Positive and negative predictive values were respectively 99.0 % and 91.5 %.


2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-118
Author(s):  
Mohammad Amzad Hossain ◽  
Md Zahedul Alam ◽  
Md Rojibul Haque ◽  
Md Nazmul Haque ◽  
KM Nurul Alam ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the role of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the preoperative diagnosis of malignancy in parotid and submandibular gland neoplasm. Methods: This cross sectional study on 50 cases was conducted in the Department of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery of Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital and Dhaka Medical College Hospital from January’2009 to June 2010. Results: Fine needle aspiration cytology findings of our all 50 cases were compared with postoperative histopathological reports. Out of the 50 cases, in 36(72%) cases of benign neoplasm and 7(14%) cases of malignant neoplasm, pre-operative FNAC findings and post operative histopathological findings were same. In 7 cases, FNAC and post operative histopathological findings did not matched. These were 2 (4%) false positive and 5 (10%) false negative result.In our study sensitivity of FNAC for reporting malignancy was 58.33%, specificity to rule out malignancy was 94.73% and overall accuracy in detecting malignant tumour was 86%. Positive predictive value and negative value were 77.77% and 87.80% respectively. It can be concluded that fine needle aspiration cytology is a safe, cheap and useful preoperative diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of malignancy in parotid and submandibular gland, but as fine needle aspiration cytology partly depends on operator skill, it may give false negative and false positive result. Conclusion: FNAC is a useful preoperative diagnostic tool for malignant parotid and submandibular glands with high specificity and sensitivity. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v19i2.17634 Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 19(2): 110-118


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document