scholarly journals Rule for reducing a Square Root to a continued Fraction

1805 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 20-23
Author(s):  
James Ivory
Author(s):  
Christophe Reutenauer

This chapter provesMarkoff’s theorem for approximations: if x is an irrational real number such that its Lagrange number L(x) is <3, then the continued fraction of x is ultimately periodic and has as periodic pattern a Christoffel word written on the alphabet 11, 22. Moreover, the bound is attained: this means that there are indeed convergents whose error terms are correctly bounded. For this latter result, one needs a lot of technical results, which use the notion of good and bad approximation of a real number x satisfying L(x) <3: the ranks of the good and bad convergents are precisely given. These results are illustrated by the golden ratio and the number 1 + square root of 2.


Geophysics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 1394-1399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Rühl

Finite‐difference (FD) migration is one of the most often used standard migration methods in practice. The merit of FD migration is its ability to handle arbitrary laterally and vertically varying macro velocity fields. The well‐known disadvantage is that wave propagation is only performed accurately in a more or less narrow cone around the vertical. This shortcoming originates from the fact that the exact one‐way wave equation can be implemented only approximately in finite‐difference schemes because of economical reasons. The Taylor or continued fraction expansion of the square root operator in the one‐way wave equation must be truncated resulting in an approximate version of the one‐way wave equation valid only for a restricted angle range.


2001 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfred J. van der Poorten

Dedicated to George Szekeres on his 90th birthdayWe discuss the exponential growth in the height of the coefficients of the partial quotients of the continued fraction expansion of the square root of a generic polynomial.


2012 ◽  
Vol 96 (536) ◽  
pp. 251-260
Author(s):  
Shailesh A. Shirali

Here is a result which will surely make one sit up. We start with a sequence t1= (1, 1, 2, 2, 4, 4, 8, 8, 16, 16, … ) in which each power of 2 occurs twice in succession, and produce a second sequence whosenth term is the sum of thenth and (n + 1) th terms of the original one; we get the sequence t2= (2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, … ). We repeat the same operation on the resulting sequence, and continue this, iteratively. Here are the sequences t3, t4, t5:t3= (5, 7, 10, 14, 20, 28, 40, 56, 80, 1l2, 160, 224, 320, 448,…),t4= (12, 17, 24, 34, 48, 68, 96, 136, 192, 272, 384, 544, 768,…),t5= (29,41, 58, 82, 116, 164,232, 328, 464, 656, 928, 1312,…).If we compute the ratio of the second term to the first term for each ti, we get the following sequence of rational numbers,which converges to the square root of 2. (These fractions turn out to be successive convergents to the simple continued fraction for √2; see Section IV for details.)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document