A Stochastic Dominance Analysis of Alternative Marketing Strategies for Mixed Crop Farms in North Florida

1986 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwabena A. Anaman ◽  
William G. Boggess

AbstractCumulative probability distributions of income for management scenarios involving four preharvest marketing strategies are subjected to stochastic dominance analysis to determine risk-efficient sets of strategies for different groups of farmers in North Florida. Results indicate that farmers should behave differently in their choice of marketing strategies according to their risk attitudes. Highly risk-averse farmers should prefer some forward contracting while low risk-averse and risk-loving farmers should prefer cash sales at harvest. Use of the futures markets leads to both higher income and greater risk than forward contracting but lower income and risk than cash sales.

1995 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 1487 ◽  
Author(s):  
KA Parton ◽  
PS Carberry

Stochastic dominance and mean-standard deviation analysis can be effective procedures for ranking risky alternatives that are expressed in terms of probability distributions of outcomes. However, the conditions applying to their use and their limitations need to be understood. These are set out in the paper, together with an extension that overcomes some constraints to the use of stochastic dominance analysis.


1986 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vickie J. Alexander ◽  
Wesley N. Musser ◽  
George Mason

AbstractIncorporation of futures markets into the theory of the firm under uncertainty has received considerable attention in risk management. A theoretical model of optimal firm decisions in cash and futures markets considering price, production, and financial risks is presented. Production and marketing strategies for corn and soybeans in Georgia and Illinois are analyzed to determine the optimal amount of futures contracting which may be a hedge or a speculative position. A partial hedge is optimal for most situations for risk averse producers when the amount hedged is variable. With fixed quantity transactions, speculative and cash positions, but not hedging, tend to be E-V efficient.


1991 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles B. Moss ◽  
Stephen A. Ford ◽  
Mario Castejon

AbstractThis study examined the relationship between debt position and choice of marketing instrument. Specifically, this study employed first and second degree stochastic dominance, and stochastic dominance with respect to a function to determine whether the efficient marketing instrument changes between debt positions. The results indicate that the choice of marketing instrument does vary with debt position in some marketing periods if the decisionmaker is moderately risk averse.


CrystEngComm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
anqi da ◽  
aijun ren ◽  
Rong Chen ◽  
Xingde Zhang ◽  
yonglan pan ◽  
...  

In this paper, we focused on the influence of common serum cations on monosodium urate monohydrate (MSUM) crystals nucleation determined from cumulative probability distributions (CPD) of the solute crystal nucleation...


Author(s):  
Margareta Gardijan Kedžo

The chapter investigates chosen hedging strategies with options as useful risk hedging instruments. Assuming that average investor prefers greater return, is risk-averse, and prefers greater positive skewness, the performance of different hedged and unhedged portfolios is evaluated using stochastic dominance (SD) criteria and data envelopment analysis (DEA). The SD is examined up to the third degree (TSD) using Davidson-Duclos (DD) test. In the DEA, a super efficiency BCC model is used. It is investigated how these two methodologies can be combined and how the TSD criteria can be integrated into DEA in order to simplify the analysis of determining efficient hedging strategies with options.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document