QUANTILE REGRESSION WITH MISMEASURED COVARIATES

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1010-1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne M. Schennach

This paper establishes that the availability of instrumental variables enables the identification and the consistent estimation of nonparametric quantile regression models in the presence of measurement error in the regressors. The proposed estimator takes the form of a nonlinear functional of derivatives of conditional expectations and is shown to provide estimated quantile functions that are uniformly consistent over a compact set.

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 503-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice X.D. Dong ◽  
Jennifer S.K. Chan ◽  
Gareth W. Peters

AbstractWe develop quantile functions from regression models in order to derive risk margin and to evaluate capital in non-life insurance applications. By utilizing the entire range of conditional quantile functions, especially higher quantile levels, we detail how quantile regression is capable of providing an accurate estimation of risk margin and an overview of implied capital based on the historical volatility of a general insurers loss portfolio. Two modeling frameworks are considered based around parametric and non-parametric regression models which we develop specifically in this insurance setting. In the parametric framework, quantile functions are derived using several distributions including the flexible generalized beta (GB2) distribution family, asymmetric Laplace (AL) distribution and power-Pareto (PP) distribution. In these parametric model based quantile regressions, we detail two basic formulations. The first involves embedding the quantile regression loss function from the nonparameteric setting into the argument of the kernel of a parametric data likelihood model, this is well known to naturally lead to the AL parametric model case. The second formulation we utilize in the parametric setting adopts an alternative quantile regression formulation in which we assume a structural expression for the regression trend and volatility functions which act to modify a base quantile function in order to produce the conditional data quantile function. This second approach allows a range of flexible parametric models to be considered with different tail behaviors. We demonstrate how to perform estimation of the resulting parametric models under a Bayesian regression framework. To achieve this, we design Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling strategies for the resulting Bayesian posterior quantile regression models. In the non-parametric framework, we construct quantile functions by minimizing an asymmetrically weighted loss function and estimate the parameters under the AL proxy distribution to resemble the minimization process. This quantile regression model is contrasted to the parametric AL mean regression model and both are expressed as a scale mixture of uniform distributions to facilitate efficient implementation. The models are extended to adopt dynamic mean, variance and skewness and applied to analyze two real loss reserve data sets to perform inference and discuss interesting features of quantile regression for risk margin calculations.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Young Michael Fu ◽  
Joel L Horowitz ◽  
Matthias Parey

Summary This paper presents a test for exogeneity of explanatory variables in a nonparametric instrumental variables (IV) model whose structural function is identified through a conditional quantile restriction. Quantile regression models are increasingly important in applied econometrics. As with mean-regression models, an erroneous assumption that the explanatory variables in a quantile regression model are exogenous can lead to highly misleading results. In addition, a test of exogeneity based on an incorrectly specified parametric model can produce misleading results. This paper presents a test of exogeneity that does not assume that the structural function belongs to a known finite-dimensional parametric family and does not require estimation of this function. The latter property is important because nonparametric estimates of the structural function are unavoidably imprecise. The test presented here is consistent whenever the structural function differs from the conditional quantile function on a set of nonzero probability. The test has nontrivial power uniformly over a large class of structural functions that differ from the conditional quantile function by $O({n^{ - 1/2}})$. The results of Monte Carlo experiments and an empirical application illustrate the performance of the test.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Chikashi Tsuji

This paper empirically examines the forecast power of the previous day’s US implied volatility for large declines of the Nikkei by using several versions of quantile regression models. All our empirical results suggest that the previous day’s US S&P 500 implied volatility has forecast power for large price drops of the Nikkei 225 in Japan. Since we repeatedly and carefully tested the several left tail risks in price changes of the Nikkei and we also tested by using some different versions of quantile regression models, our evidence of the predictive power of the S&P 500 implied volatility for downside risk of the Nikkei is very robust.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuecai Xu ◽  
Željko Šarić

This study intended to investigate the interactions between accident severity levels and traffic signs in state roads located in Croatia and explore the correlation between accident severity levels and heterogeneity attributed to unobserved factors. The data from 460 state roads between 2012 and 2016 were collected from Traffic Accident Database System maintained by the Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Interior. To address the correlation and heterogeneity, Bayesian bivariate Tobit quantile regression models were proposed, in which the bivariate framework addressed the correlation of residuals with Bayesian approach, while the Tobit quantile regression model accommodated the heterogeneity due to unobserved factors. By comparing the Bayesian bivariate Tobit quantile and mean regression models, the proposed quantile models showed priority to mean model. Results revealed that (1) low visibility and the number of invalid traffic signs per km increased the accident rate of material damage, death, or injury; (2) average speed limit exhibited a close relation with accident rate; and (3) the number of mandatory signs was more likely to reduce the accident rate of material damage, while the number of warning signs was significant for accident rate of death or injury.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akram Yazdani ◽  
Mehdi Yaseri ◽  
Shahpar Haghighat ◽  
Ahmad Kaviani ◽  
Hojjat Zeraati

AbstractThe Cox proportional hazards model is a widely used statistical method for the censored data that model the hazard rate rather than survival time. To overcome complexity of interpreting hazard ratio, quantile regression was introduced for censored data with more straightforward interpretation. Different methods for analyzing censored data using quantile regression model, have been introduced. The quantile regression approach models the quantile function of failure time and investigates the covariate effects in different quantiles. In this model, the covariate effects can be changed for patients with different risk and is a flexible model for controlling the heterogeneity of covariate effects. We illustrated and compared five methods in quantile regression for right censored data included Portnoy, Wang and Wang, Bottai and Zhang, Yang and De Backer methods. The comparison was made through the use of these methods in modeling the survival time of breast cancer. According to the results of quantile regression models, tumor grade and stage of the disease were identified as significant factors affecting 20th percentile of survival time. In Bottai and Zhang method, 20th percentile of survival time for a case with higher unit of stage decreased about 14 months and 20th percentile of survival time for a case with higher grade decreased about 13 months. The quantile regression models acted the same to determine prognostic factors of breast cancer survival in most of the time. The estimated coefficients of five methods were close to each other for quantiles lower than 0.1 and they were different from quantiles upper than 0.1.


Bernoulli ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (4B) ◽  
pp. 3311-3338
Author(s):  
Toshio Honda ◽  
Ching-Kang Ing ◽  
Wei-Ying Wu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document