The lattice properties of asymmetric hyperbolic regions

Author(s):  
J. W. S. Cassels

Let θ > 0 and α ≠ 0 be real numbers, and let θ be irrational. Khintchine has shown, by the use of continued fractions, that there is an infinite number of pairs of positive integers (p, q) which satisfy the inequalityfor any given K > 5−½; and, more recently, Jogin has shown the same is still true with K = 5−½. The condition that p and q shall be positive is, of course, essential, as otherwise there is the classical result K = ¼ due to Minkowski.

1966 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 637-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. W. Cusick

For a real number λ, ‖λ‖ is the absolute value of the difference between λ and the nearest integer. Let X represent the m-tuple (x1, x2, … xm) and letbe any n linear forms in m variables, where the Θij are real numbers. The following is a classical result of Khintchine (1):For all pairs of positive integers m, n there is a positive constant Г(m, n) with the property that for any forms Lj(X) there exist real numbers α1, α2, …, αn such thatfor all integers x1, x2, …, xm not all zero.


Author(s):  
Gavin Brown ◽  
William Moran

A typical Riesz product on the circle is the weak* limitwhere – 1 ≤ rk ≤ 1, øk ∈ R, λT is Haar measure, and the positive integers nk satisfy nk+1/nk ≥ 3. A classical result of Zygmund (11) implies that either µ is absolutely continuous with respect to λT (when ) or µ is purely singular (when ).


Author(s):  
Madhu Raka

Let Qn be a real indefinite quadratic form in n variables x1, x2,…, xn, of determinant D ≠ 0 and of type (r, s), 0 < r < n, n = r + s. Let σ denote the signature of Qn so that σ = r − s. It is known (see e.g. Blaney(4)) that, given any real numbers c1 c2, …, cn, there exists a constant C depending upon n and σ only such that the inequalityhas a solution in integers x1, x2, …, xn. Let Cr, s denote the infimum of all such constants. Clearly Cr, s = Cs, r, so we need consider non-negative signatures only. For n = 2, C1, 1 = ¼ follows from a classical result of Minkowski on the product of two linear forms. When n = 3, Davenport (5) proved that C2, 1 = 27/100. For all n and σ = 0, Birch (3) proved that Cr, r = ¼. In 1962, Watson(18) determined the values of Cr, s for all n ≥ 21 and for all signatures σ. He proved thatWatson also conjectured that (1·2) holds for all n ≥ 4. Dumir(6) proved Watson's conjecture for n = 4. For n = 5, it was proved by Hans-Gill and Madhu Raka(7, 8). The author (12) has proved the conjecture for σ = 1 and all n. In the preceding paper (13) we proved that C5, 1 = 1. In this paper we prove Watson's conjecture for σ = 2, 3 and 4.


1965 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Robertson

We prove the following theorem, which was established by Abel (1) for the case u = 1.Theorem. If u, k are positive integers and x, 1, , u, are real numbers, thenwhere the sum is taken over all distinct ordered solutions (s1, , su) in non-negative integers of the equation .


1962 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. H. Diananda

Throughout this paper, unless otherwise stated, n and L stand for positive integers and α, t, x, x1, x2, … for positive real numbers. Letwhereand


Author(s):  
H. R. Pitt

A fundamental result in the theory of measure in the space Ω of real functions x(t) of a real variable t is the following theorem of Kolmogoroff:Theorem 1. Suppose that functions F(t1, …, tn; b1 …, bn) = F(t; b) are defined for positive integers n and real numbers t1, …, tn, b1, …, bn, and have the following properties:(1·1) For every fixedt1, …, tn, F(t; b) has non-negative differenceswith respect to the variables bl, b2,…, bn, and is continuous on the right with respect to each of them;if (i1, …, in) is any permutation of (1, 2, …, n). Then a measure P(X) can be defined in a Borel system of subsets of Ω in such a way that the set of functions satisfyingis measurable for any realbi, tiand has measure F(t; b).


Author(s):  
K. R. Matthews ◽  
R. F. C. Walters

Introduction. Continued fractions of the form are called Hurwitzian if b1, …, bh, are positive integers, ƒ1(x), …, ƒk(x) are polynomials with rational coefficients which take positive integral values for x = 0, 1, 2, …, and at least one of the polynomials is not constant. f1(x), …, fk(x) are said to form a quasi-period.


1981 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 946-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Borwein ◽  
Amnon Jakimovski

Suppose throughout that {kn} is a sequence of positive integers, thatthat k0 = 1 if l0 = 1, and that {un(r)}; (r = 0, 1, …, kn – 1, n = 0, 1, …) is a sequence of real numbers. We shall be concerned with the problem of establishing necessary and sufficient conditions for there to be a function a satisfying(1)and certain additional conditions. The case l0 = 0, kn = 1 for n = 0, 1, … of the problem is the version of the classical moment problem considered originally by Hausdorff [5], [6], [7]; the above formulation will emerge as a natural generalization thereof.


1965 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 616-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Baker

It is well known that for any real number θ there are infinitely many positive integers n such thatHere ||a|| denotes the distance of a from the nearest integer, taken positively. Indeed, since ||a|| < 1, this implies more generally that if θ1, θ2, . . . , θk are any real numbers, then there are infinitely many positive integers n such that


1977 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.C. Dumir ◽  
R.J. Hans-Gill

Let R be the field of real numbers. For α in R, let ‖α‖ be the distance of α from the nearest integer. The following conjecture of Kurt Mahler [Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 14 (1976), 463–465] is proved.Let m, n be two positive integers n ≥ 2m. Let S be a finite or infinite set of positive integers with the following properties:(Q1) S contains the integers m, m+1, …, n−m;(Q2) every element of S satisfiesThen


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document