Lagged Y cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus

1991 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Mastronarde ◽  
Allen L. Humphrey ◽  
Alan B. Saul
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Spatial Summation ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
Antidromic Activation ◽  
Inhibitory Processes ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Response Profile ◽  
Initial Dip ◽  
Y Cells

AbstractWe report on the existence of lagged Y (YL) cells in the A laminae of the cat lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and on criteria for identifying them using visual and electrical stimulation. Like the lagged X (XL) cells described previously (Mastronarde, 1987a; Humphrey & Weller, 1988a), YL cells responded to a spot stimulus with an initial dip in firing and a delayed latency to discharge after spot onset, and an anomalously prolonged firing after spot offset. However, the cells received excitatory input from retinal Y rather than X afferents, and showed nonlinear spatial summation and other Y-like receptive-field properties. Three YL cells tested for antidromic activation from visual cortex were found to be relay cells, with long conduction latencies similar to those of XL cells.Simultaneous recordings of a YL cell and its retinal Y afferents show striking parallels between lagged X and Y cells in retinogeniculate functional connectivity, and suggest that the YL-cell response profile reflects inhibitory processes occurring within the LGN. The YL cells comprised -5% of Y cells and -1% of all cells in the A laminae. Although infrequently encountered in the LGN, they may be roughly as numerous as Y cells in the retina, and hence could fulfill an important role in vision.

Cholinergic mechanisms in the reticular control of transmission in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus

1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1690-1718 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Francesconi ◽  
C. M. Muller ◽  
W. Singer
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Mesencephalic Reticular Formation ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Evoked Responses ◽  
Cholinergic Mechanism ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Postinhibitory Rebound ◽  
Resting Activity ◽  
Y Cells

1. We examined the hypothesis that the ascending reticular arousal system influences thalamic transmission through a cholinergic mechanism. Extra- and intracellular recordings were obtained from neurons of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGNd) and the perigeniculate nucleus (PGN) of cats anesthetized either with N2O and pentobarbital or with N2O and halothane. We compared the effects that electrical stimulation of the mesencephalic reticular formation (MRF) and ionophoretically applied acetylcholine (ACh) have on spontaneous and evoked activity of individual neurons and tested whether these effects could be antagonized by ionophoretic administration of the muscarinic receptor blocker scopolamine. The effects of ionophoretically applied glutamate (GLU), N-methyl-D-aspartate, and bicuculline were examined in addition. 2. The prominent effects in LGNd relay cells of both ACh application and of MRF stimulation were an enhancement of the resting discharge, a facilitation of the excitatory responses to light, a reduction of the amplitude and duration of evoked inhibitory episodes, and a blockade of postinhibitory rebound burst. These latter effects resembled those induced with bicuculline. Under barbiturate anesthesia neither ACh application nor MRF stimulation elicited discharges when the excitatory input from the retina was blocked. Ionophoretic application of hte muscarinic antagonist scopolamine abolished the effects of ACh ionophoresis in all relay cells tested (n = 20), and in 10 cells it also antagonized completely the effects of MRF stimulation. In the remaining cells scopolamine reduced the effects of MRF stimulation. 3. Increasing the depth of anesthesia reduced or abolished the effects of ACh application and MRF stimulation on the cells' resting activity but did not interfere with the facilitation of evoked responses. 4. The effects of the excitatory amino acids GLU and NMDA differed from those of MRF stimulation and ACh application, since the former always enhanced both spontaneous and evoked discharges but neither shortened phases of evoked inhibition nor abolished postinhibitory rebound bursts. 5. There was a high correlation between the effectiveness of MRF stimulation and ACh application in individual neurons. On the average, the facilitation of evoked responses was more pronounced in X- than in Y-cells, and the fraction of cells responding with an increase of resting activity to both procedures was considerably higher among X- than among Y-cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Two Different Types of Y Cells in the Cat Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 1852-1864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-I Yeh ◽  
Carl R. Stoelzel ◽  
Jose-Manuel Alonso
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Single Channel ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Spatial Summation ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Spatial Parameters ◽  
Latency Response ◽  
X Cells ◽  
Y Cells

The Y pathway in the cat visual system is traditionally viewed as a single channel that originates in the retina. However, most Y cells from the contralateral retina diverge to innervate two different layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus, suggesting a possible channel split: YC (Y geniculate cell in layer C) and YA (Y geniculate cell in layer A). We tested the functional significance of this anatomical divergence by comparing the response properties of simultaneously recorded YC and YA geniculate cells with overlapping receptive fields. Our results demonstrate that YC and YA cells significantly differ in a large number of temporal and spatial parameters including response latency, response transiency, receptive-field size, and linearity of spatial summation. Furthermore, for some of these parameters, the differences between YC and YA cells are as pronounced as the differences between Y and X cells in layer A. These results along with results from previous studies strongly suggest that Y retinal afferents diverge into two separate channels at the level of the thalamus.

Postnatal development of receptive field surround inhibition in kitten dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus

1986 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 523-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Tootle ◽  
M. J. Friedlander
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Spatial Summation ◽  
Optic Chiasm ◽  
Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Surround Inhibition ◽  
Physiological Properties ◽  
Y Cells ◽  
Dorsal Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Stimulation Of

We recorded the responses to visual stimulation of single neurons in the A-layers of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGNd) of 4- to 5-wk-old kittens and adult cats. Visual stimuli were generated on a cathode-ray tube (CRT) display and consisted of circular spots and annuli whose contrast was twice the threshold for each neuron and was modulated about a background luminance of 28 cd/m2 at 0.5 Hz. Neural responses were collected as interspike intervals and displayed as instantaneous firing rates for individual trials. From the responses to a series of sizes of spot stimuli, area-response functions were constructed and used to derive a quantitative measure of the strength of the receptive field (RF) surround inhibition of each neuron, the spatial density minimum ([SDmin[). To separate neural from optical factors that affect measurements of surround inhibition, published values for the posterior nodal distances of the kitten and adult eye were used to scale stimuli in terms of the retinal area subtended. Of 153 kitten and 95 adult LGNd neurons studied, the responses to a complete series of spot stimuli of different sizes (areas) were obtained for 52 kitten neurons [44 with linear spatial summation (L) and 8 with nonlinear spatial summation (NL)] and 45 adult (24 X-and 21 Y-) neurons. In addition, intracellular recordings were made from 30 of the kitten neurons that were filled iontophoretically with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and were evaluated structurally. In the adult, neurons were classified as X-or Y-cells on the basis of a battery of physiological properties, including linearity of spatial summation, latency to electrical stimulation of the optic chiasm, and ability to respond reliably to rapidly moving stimuli. Kitten neuronal responses allowed them to be clearly identified as exhibiting linear or nonlinear spatial summation, but application of additional criteria produced ambiguous results for classification into X-or Y-categories. Kitten L or NL neurons showed differences typical of adult X-and Y-cells on some [e.g., RF center size (P less than 0.01)] but not other [e.g., latency to stimulation of optic chiasm (P greater than 0.40)] properties. In addition, by direct comparison of morphological features with these physiological responses, some kitten cells with adult X-cell physiological properties on these tests were found to have typical adult Y-cell somadendritic structure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effects of Saccades on the Activity of Neurons in the Cat Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 922-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daeyeol Lee ◽  
Joseph G. Malpeli
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Dark Condition ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Visual Inputs ◽  
Saccade Velocity ◽  
Time Courses ◽  
Evoked Activity ◽  
X Cells ◽  
Y Cells

Lee, Daeyeol and Joseph G. Malpeli. Effects of saccades on the activity of neurons in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 922–936, 1998. Effects of saccades on individual neurons in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) were examined under two conditions: during spontaneous saccades in the dark and during stimulation by large, uniform flashes delivered at various times during and after rewarded saccades made to small visual targets. In the dark condition, a suppression of activity began 200–300 ms before saccade start, peaked ∼100 ms before saccade start, and smoothly reversed to a facilitation of activity by saccade end. The facilitation peaked 70–130 ms after saccade end and decayed during the next several hundred milliseconds. The latency of the facilitation was related inversely to saccade velocity, reaching a minimum for saccades with peak velocity >70–80°/s. Effects of saccades on visually evoked activity were remarkably similar: a facilitation began at saccade end and peaked 50–100 ms later. When matched for saccade velocity, the time courses and magnitudes of postsaccadic facilitation for activity in the dark and during visual stimulation were identical. The presaccadic suppression observed in the dark condition was similar for X and Y cells, whereas the postsaccadic facilitation was substantially stronger for X cells, both in the dark and for visually evoked responses. This saccade-related regulation of geniculate transmission appears to be independent of the conditions under which the saccade is evoked or the state of retinal input to the LGN. The change in activity from presaccadic suppression to postsaccadic facilitation amounted to an increase in gain of geniculate transmission of ∼30%. This may promote rapid central registration of visual inputs by increasing the temporal contrast between activity evoked by an image near the end of a fixation and that evoked by the image immediately after a saccade.

Structure of physiologically identified X and Y cells in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus

Science ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 204 (4397) ◽  
pp. 1114-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Friedlander ◽  
C. Lin ◽  
S. Sherman
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Geniculate Nucleus ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
X And Y Cells ◽  
Y Cells
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document