scholarly journals The chimera of achievement

1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-109
Author(s):  
David W.H. Walton

Antarctic Science is now in its tenth year with the number of pages increasing, its citation rate increasing and the enthusiasm of its editors undimmed! We are grateful to all our contributors, editorial board members and referees for their support which have made the journal what it is. This is a good time to take stock and consider the future.

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. v-xii
Author(s):  
Michael R. M. Ward

It is with real pleasure that I introduce this issue of Boyhood Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal (BHS), my first full issue as Editor. The past few months have been a learning curve in terms of the roles and responsibilities expected when editing an international journal, but I am very pleased with what we have to offer here. At a very important and critical time for gender scholars, I want to use this editorial as a general announcement of the editorial change, or addition, in editorship and the future direction, I would like to take the journal in. It is also an opportunity to introduce editorial board members, old and new to the readership and to outline what follows in volume 12, issue 1.


INDIAN DRUGS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (05) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Saranjit Singh ◽  

Dear Reader, I have followed the progress of Indian Drugs for more than three decades, and have the privilege of being on its editorial board for the last many years. Currently, the journal is in its 55th year, since its inception in 1963. There are many stalwarts, many of them still living, who have nurtured this journal in different roles, through its journey of more than five decades. They did their best, and that is the reason the journal has survived all through these years, without even being handled by a commercial publisher. The Editors, Advisory, and Editorial Board members of the journal and staff of IDMA deserve congratulations for their all-out effortsand making sure that the journal is timely published month after month, year after year. The journal has even been modernizing over the period, and now for several years (since 2012) it is available on-line, apart from being circulated in the print form. It is also abstracted widely presently.


2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Barry Trott

With the coming of holidays it is always a good time to reflect thankfully on the collaborative nature of the work that makes it possible to get out a journal such as RUSQ. First off, I would like to thank the members of the RUSQ editorial board. The board members are the first readers of submissions to the journal and I appreciate their thoughtful reviews and suggestions for ways to improve articles. Without their work, the journal would not offer our readers the quality in breadth and depth of feature articles that support and move the profession forward. The board members also help guide the journal’s policies and procedures, offering thoughtful suggestions and ideas for improving both content and processes. For volume 54, the editorial board members were Jenny S. Bossaller, Heidi LM Jacobs, Kate Kosturski, Scott Seaman, Carol Singer, Nicolette Sosulski, Laurel Tarulli, David A. Tyckoson, Chiang A. Wang, and Neal Wyatt.


1981 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Barclay ◽  
Beverly M. Brown ◽  
Samuel T. Gladding ◽  
Rodney K. Goodyear ◽  
Donald G. Hays ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 104225872110105
Author(s):  
Marco van Gelderen ◽  
Johan Wiklund ◽  
Jeffery S. McMullen

What will entrepreneurship look like in 2030? We conducted a Delphi panel study asking this question of editors and Editorial Review Board members of the two leading entrepreneurship journals, Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice in an attempt to lift the eyes of the field to the horizon, outside academe, if only briefly. Using thematic coding analysis, we identified close to 1000 first-order codes from the 175 scholars surveyed, which we categorized into 24 distinct themes. From this input in the first round, we generated 93 predictions, which were assessed by the panel in terms of likelihood in a second round. It is our hope that these themes and predictions might serve to inspire our present research, teaching, and entrepreneurial endeavors, and spur debate and discussions among (future) entrepreneurship scholars of future-relevant phenomena that can potentially be studied under the rubric of entrepreneurship.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-331
Author(s):  
Daryl D. Buss
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Celso Cunha
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-77
Author(s):  
Martin Bergen
Keyword(s):  

NASPA Journal ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry D. Roper

For the past 18 months the NASPA Journal Editorial Board has been engaged in an ongoing conversation about the future direction of the Journal. Among the issues we have discussed are: What should comprise the content of the Journal?, How do we decide when or if we will move the Journal to an electronic format?, What do our members want in the Journal?, and What type of scholarship should we be publishing? The last question — What type of scholarship should we be publishing? — led to an energetic conversation within the Editorial Board.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document