Endometriosis-associated infertility

1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
AF Haney

Despite intense clinical interest, increasing numbers of infertile couples with endometriosis-associated infertility and ever more sophisticated diagnostic technology, optimal treatment of the infertility remains frustrating. In the absence of mechanical compromise of the pelvic viscera, there is no treatment directed towards the endometriosis itself, medical or surgical, which alleviates the infertility experienced by these couples. The reason for this lack of therapeutic progress is most likely related to the lack of consensus regarding the mechanism(s) by which the endometriosis or its pathophysiology may cause infertility. The possibility that infertility from another, as yet unidentifiable, cause(s) results in repetitive, nonconceptive, ovulatory menstrual cycles and leads to the development of endometriosis remains just as viable a hypothesis. The most useful current therapeutic approach is to consider these couples as having ‘unexplained’ infertility and utilize nonspecific cycle fecundity enhancement such as controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination or IVF. Since the fecundity of women with endometriosis in the later reproductive years continues to rapidly decline, this represents their most cost-effective option. While these nonspecific treatments may normalize the cycle fecundity, they are expensive and fraught with the hazards of multiple gestation and ovarian hyperstimulation. While efforts to reduce the risks of this approach are being made, improved therapeutic success with less hazard and cost will continue to remain elusive until the mechanism(s) of the infertility associated with endometriosis is conclusively defined.

Author(s):  
Sayanti Paul ◽  
Saumen Mandal ◽  
Arghya Pal ◽  
Sumit Ranjan Pramanik

Background: Being a diagnosis of exclusion the treatment options of unexplained infertility are often empiric. There is significant dilemma regarding the superiority of one over another. Despite increasing use of intrauterine insemination (IUI) in adjunct to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) there is scarcity of randomized controlled trials (RCT) from developing countries. Objective was to compare IUI and timed intercourse (TI) in super ovulated cycles among couples with unexplained infertility over one year.Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled trial total 85 patients were randomly assigned into group 1 (COH with IUI, N= 44) and group 2 (COH with TI, N=41). Patients underwent COH using sequential Clomiphene Citrate and injection human menopausal gonadotrophin followed by IUI in group 1 and timed intercourse in group 2. Either protocol was repeated for three consecutive cycles. Finally, both groups were compared for clinical pregnancy rate, adverse effects and acceptability of the treatment process and outcome. Comparison was done by Student’s unpaired t test for continuous and 2-tailed chi square test for categorical variables.Results: Clinical pregnancy rates following COH/IUI and COH/TI were 13.64% and 19.51% respectively. There was observable difference in the acceptability of the outcome (38.64% in IUI and 56.09% in TI group). All the results including complications and side effect rates were statistically insignificant.Conclusions: Present study failed to show any improvement of pregnancy rates following addition of IUI over TI and it raised the probability that the outcome of the procedure may not be well accepted.


1992 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 801-802
Author(s):  
SHEILA J. DIMARZO ◽  
JOSEPH F. KENNEDY ◽  
PHILIP E. YOUNG ◽  
STEPHEN A. HEBERT ◽  
DIANNE C. ROSENBERG ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document